• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Severance package problem"

Collapse

  • Peter W
    replied
    Thanks very much everyone!

    Leave a comment:


  • SameOldStory
    replied
    3 years seems excessive.
    Most of these clauses have two purposes:
    1) to avoid huge tax implications of the non-taxed severance package if they re-employ you within a certain time period (I think it is 6 months).
    2) to prevent permies leaving to come back as contractors on more money (most of these say 6 months)

    1) will be a tax issue and unchangeable
    2) will be a company policy issue and doesn't really apply if the term in your severance package said "employ".

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Being paranoid I would say the company is out to recover the severance package.

    There is plenty of work about, so I'd say give it a miss until the time has run out.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mordac
    replied
    Originally posted by Peter W
    The strings attached to the severance package were that I couldn’t be employed at the company again within a 3 year period.
    "Strings" imposed by whom? If it was your former employer, and they are now considering offering you a contract, then it sounds like they are not so bothered about breaking their own terms.
    If it's a direct contract (i.e. no agency) then you could probably get around this by having a proper B2B contract, where you are not mentioned by name, except as an authorised signatory/director of the supplier. This ought to get you outside IR35 as well, so it's worth doing anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • DaveB
    replied
    Since you are operating as a business in your own right - yes, you are, dont argue - then you can't be an employee of your previous employer.

    The client is not employing you, they have let a contract with your company. You just happen to be the resource allocated to that client.

    Provided there is no contract directly between you as a person and the client, and for the life of me I cant see why there should be, then there should be no problem.

    Just out of interest, is this a direct contract or via an agency? If it's via an agency you have even less to worry about about as the client conteract is with the agency, not your company.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrsGoof
    replied
    sounds like you may need an employment lawyer

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter W
    started a topic Severance package problem

    Severance package problem

    Hi, can anyone point me in the right direction with this one please.

    I accepted a permanent job 3 years ago and ended up leaving this job with a severance package 9 months ago as the company was relocating. The strings attached to the severance package were that I couldn’t be employed at the company again within a 3 year period. I now have the possibility of returning to the company as a contractor, working via my own Ltd Company and I was just wondering if this could be in breach of the contract I signed to obtain the severance package ie I don’t want to have to pay this back, or the tax element as it was tax free.

    Thanks for your help
    Last edited by Peter W; 11 May 2006, 14:06.
Working...
X