• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Where's the flaw?

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Where's the flaw?"

Collapse

  • DonkeyRhubarb
    replied
    Fair enough.

    Btw, it was purely hypothetical as I'm not involved in contracting anymore.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
    Husband and wife.

    Wife sets up Ltd Co as sole director.

    Ltd Co employs husband on lowish salary.

    Contract between Ltd Co and agency for husband's services.

    Wife draws all the dividends. (Husband only gets his salary.)

    Does IR35 still apply?
    No, got nothing to do with IR35 (why won't people learn what it means, FFS). But Ramsay might, if Hector was feeling vindictive, in which case the husband gets clobbered for full taxes on the gross since it is clearly his salary

    However post-Arctic there is absolutely zero point in such an arrangement, unless the husband is disqualified from being a company director. And that doesn't stop him being a shareholder anyway.

    Leave a comment:


  • Clare@InTouch
    replied
    Per HMRC:

    The circumstances in which the legislation applies

    If you provide your services to a client (the end-user) via an intermediary, typically a service company or partnership, and the intermediary does not meet the definition of a Managed Service Company, then the IR35 legislation may apply to engagements with that client.

    Broadly, it applies to those engagements where –

    •you personally perform services for another person (the client);
    •the services are provided not directly with the client but under arrangements involving an intermediary; and
    •the circumstances are such that, if you had provided the services directly to the client under a contract between you and the client, you would have been regarded for income tax purposes as an employee of the client and/or, for NICs purposes, as employed in employed earner’s employment by the client.

    In addition you must receive or have rights entitling you to receive a payment or benefit that is not employment income. "

    HM Revenue & Customs:IR35 -The circumstances in which the legislation applies


    I'd say you still meet the criteria. You're still going to receive benefits from the work that isn't via employment income by virtue of the fact that it's your wife who holds the shares and gets the dividends.

    Leave a comment:


  • DonkeyRhubarb
    started a topic Where's the flaw?

    Where's the flaw?

    Husband and wife.

    Wife sets up Ltd Co as sole director.

    Ltd Co employs husband on lowish salary.

    Contract between Ltd Co and agency for husband's services.

    Wife draws all the dividends. (Husband only gets his salary.)

    Does IR35 still apply?

Working...
X