• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: AWR Guidance

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "AWR Guidance"

Collapse

  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    A Contract of Employment which makes payment between assignments would mean that the employee would not fall within the scope of section 5 of the regulations which relate to equal pay. In theory a Ltd Company contractor whose contract falls inside IR35 could make a claim against an agency/hirer for unequal treatment with regard to conditions and also pay.

    Leave a comment:


  • Vallah
    replied
    Originally posted by Steven@Parasol View Post
    How about if the umbrella is paying contractors in between assignments,
    Isn't that what you'll have to do if the temporary worker forgoes the equal pay provision after 12 weeks?

    Leave a comment:


  • Steven@Parasol
    replied
    Originally posted by Vallah View Post
    On the face of it, it seems fairly straightforward. If you're operating through a personal limited company, as long as you're IR35 compliant, then you don't have to worry about the AWR. If you're not IR35 compliant or you're working through an umbrella, then you most definitely do.
    How about if the umbrella is paying contractors in between assignments, contributing to a contractor's pension, helping them find their next assignment etc?

    Leave a comment:


  • Vallah
    replied
    Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
    I think the intention is to exclude workers who are in business on their own account - unfortunately I don't think the powers that be include inside IR35 Ltd co contractors. As you say - I think we will need guidance on the guidance - nothing new there then
    On the face of it, it seems fairly straightforward. If you're operating through a personal limited company, as long as you're IR35 compliant, then you don't have to worry about the AWR. If you're not IR35 compliant or you're working through an umbrella, then you most definitely do.

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    But the word from the BIS people talking to PCG on this subject is that the intention is that Ltd Co contractors are not in scope. The qualification in the wording is, IMHO, to do with the same logic as keeping IR35, to deter against false incorporation. Agreed, though, that it needs qualifying properly; there;'s no way I will submit to the constraints of the AWR, nor do I need their "protections".
    I think the intention is to exclude workers who are in business on their own account - unfortunately I don't think the powers that be include inside IR35 Ltd co contractors. As you say - I think we will need guidance on the guidance - nothing new there then

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
    Looking through the draft guidance for the AWR due out in October it would seem that Ltd company contractors will fall under the scope of the regulations:

    "Simply putting earnings through a Limited Company would not in itself put individuals beyond the possible scope of the Regulations.....Where the relationship between the individual, the Agency Worker and hirer remains, in essence, a tripartite relationship and a hirer is not a client of customer of such individuals, the are likely to be in scope."

    It goes on to state that someone working through their own company would be outside the Regulations if they were outside IR35 but not if they were inside.

    Full document here: Agency Worker Directive and Regulations 2010 | Policies | BIS
    But the word from the BIS people talking to PCG on this subject is that the intention is that Ltd Co contractors are not in scope. The qualification in the wording is, IMHO, to do with the same logic as keeping IR35, to deter against false incorporation. Agreed, though, that it needs qualifying properly; there;'s no way I will submit to the constraints of the AWR, nor do I need their "protections".

    Leave a comment:


  • LisaContractorUmbrella
    started a topic AWR Guidance

    AWR Guidance

    Looking through the draft guidance for the AWR due out in October it would seem that Ltd company contractors will fall under the scope of the regulations:

    "Simply putting earnings through a Limited Company would not in itself put individuals beyond the possible scope of the Regulations.....Where the relationship between the individual, the Agency Worker and hirer remains, in essence, a tripartite relationship and a hirer is not a client of customer of such individuals, the are likely to be in scope."

    It goes on to state that someone working through their own company would be outside the Regulations if they were outside IR35 but not if they were inside.

    Full document here: Agency Worker Directive and Regulations 2010 | Policies | BIS

Working...
X