Yep, I agree with you NorthernLad - prep for the worst case...
Though I'm not so worried about them coming after me for bad work, but maybe if the (client) company gets sued which somehow ropes in everyone which helped develop their system.
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "liability/warranty clauses in a contract?"
Collapse
-
Seems it is quiet here I will add a guess that you are responsible for your work and your negligence regardless. I would assume if I was working for a client and seriously screw his work up he would come after me for compensation whatever it says in the contract hence me keeping my insurance upto date and ongoing regardless....
If I assume this as worst case then I can't be dissapointed or caught it out is my take on it.
Leave a comment:
-
If you want to remain anonymous I would suggest you remove the client's name from your post.
I can't help with your question, sorry.
Leave a comment:
-
liability/warranty clauses in a contract?
Hi there,
I was about to sign a contract - to do one day a week for a relatively low amount of pay, when I saw quite a scary liability/warranty clause.
I don't earn enough on the contract to justify forming a ltd company, and umbrella fees are hefty if only a day a week. Alternatively six years of PI insurance after I leave would eat up so much of my earnings. So I mentioned it to the company, and they said OK we'll just remove the warranty/liability clause so we can just get started.
My question is, does simply removing the clause remove my liability? Or is a contract that is silent on liability assume some base-level or implied liability.
I'm not worried about things like, say, a virus, but maybe a patent troll claiming in 5 years time - I guess I could be brought in with the company?
The old clause (which is removed) is here:
6.1 The Consultant shall be liable for any loss damage or injury to any party resulting from the default, wilful misconduct or negligent act or omission of the Consultant during the Assignment and the Consultant hereby agreed to indemnify **** and keep **** indemnified against all costs claims and expenses however they arise as a result of the negligence, wilful misconduct or default of the Consultant.
Any advice most appreciated!
ThanksLast edited by jayflat; 26 April 2010, 09:18.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Today 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
Leave a comment: