- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Contract Breach
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Contract Breach"
Collapse
-
It seems that agency 1 are no longer suppliers to the end client? The wording in contracts usually states that you cannot work for the agency's client for a period of time. If the end client is no longer a client of agency 1 then tell the agent to take a hike.
-
Until lawers get involved or it goes to court a contract is just writing on a piece of paper. There may be a bit of bad feeling and unlikely they will deal with you for a short period of time but it probably won't come to anything more than a war of words.
XL's advice is good but I bet you could just tell them you don't want to hear from them again unless it's their lawyer and just leave it at that.
If they are a small worthless agency you could of course just tell them to Foxtrot Oscar and block their number
Leave a comment:
-
As with all these things, it kind of depends on the exact wording of your contract.
But my first penn'orth is.. I think that you can give agency 1 the bird. I suggest you write a nice letter back to them along the lines of
1. If you are able to offer me an extension with the client, then I'll happily take it.
2. If you want to sue me for breach of contract, then you will have to prove in a court that you have lost revenue as a result of me moving to Agent 2. You only have a right to compensation for lost revenue.
3. Since you've lost your place on the Catalist framework, you haven't lost any revenue (you couldn't supply the service to the client any more)
4. Ergo, you can sue me, but you won't get a penny, so please stop wasting everyone's time.
My second penn'orth is that you should get a lawyer to review the actual wording of your contract before writing the letter, as it does depend on how the restraint clause is worded.
Leave a comment:
-
Contract Breach
The facts are:
I work as agency staff under a limited company with Agency 1. I work for them until my contract ends which is the same point that agency 1 loses their Catalist framework agreement with the client.
I start applying to further agencies and find agency 2 which has the same role/job with the same client I was working for with agency 1 and I restart working for the client with a new contract again under the limited company.
Agency 1 writes to me as the supplier demanding a payment for breaching my contract which stated that I cannot work for the client for 6 months after the end date.
What options do I have available to contest this?Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Today 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Yesterday 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Leave a comment: