- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Inter alia clause
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Inter alia clause"
Collapse
-
I don't think you're in a very strong position to renegotiate, but you'll have to make your own judgement on that. None of those things sound too far outside the scope of a Systems Analyst to me. All cv building fodder. Depends how strongly you feel about it.
-
Schedule 1 says "The services required will be those of a Systems Analyst". However, I'm being asked to do PM, QA, BA, Client Management, Technical Writer...so slightly more than an SA. But maybe an SA is so generic, it would be anything. No specific services were given, just a role.Originally posted by Fat Dave View PostAre you happy with the description of the services described in Schedule 1?
Leave a comment:
-
I think in this case the "inter alia" is being used to refer to the services described in Schedule 1, rather than repeat them in this paragraph. It seems superfluous really.
Are you happy with the description of the services described in Schedule 1?
Leave a comment:
-
Nope, just strike out "inter alia" so the paragraph makes sense. You are there to deliver a specific piece of work as defined in the contract schedule, aren't you?
Leave a comment:
-
No real section as such. It is at the beginning of the contract:Originally posted by Not So Wise View PostThink the whole section where you took that paragraph would have to read though carefully to determine the context
THIS AGREEMENT is dated as of blah blah
BETWEEN
1. "the company" (details supplied)
AND
2. "the supplier" (details supplied)
WHEREAS
The Supplier agrees with the Company for the purposes of, inter alia, providing the services described in Schedule 1 hereto (the “Services”) to the Company pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
Can I use the fact that the sentence doesn't make an iota of sense to get out of it?
Leave a comment:
-
I take it as meaning that you'll have to do whatever they tell you to do.
You are soooooooooooo caught by IR35.
Leave a comment:
-
From a litteral point of view, it could be viewed as thatOriginally posted by Belle View Post
Does this mean that my company (the supplier) agrees to provide services as per the Schedule "amongst other things". ?
How that would stand up in court though, no idea
Think the whole section where you took that paragraph would have to read though carefully to determine the context
But regardless you are always entitled to try to renegotiate your rateLast edited by Not So Wise; 11 December 2009, 12:04.
Leave a comment:
-
Inter alia clause
Has anyone had this clause in their contract:
The Supplier agrees with the Company for the purposes of, inter alia, providing the services described in Schedule 1 hereto (the “Services”) to the Company pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.
Does this mean that my company (the supplier) agrees to provide services as per the Schedule "amongst other things". ?
I've started a contract and the job is far more than the role as described in the Schedule so I feel I'm entitled to renegotiate my rate. However, if this clause means I'll do anything, then I can't.
Thanks in advance.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Leave a comment: