• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Taxman defends debt retrieval priorities"

Collapse

  • xoggoth
    replied
    Fanciful assessments is right. If they think you have claimed £500 you shouldn't have they will just add up every expense in the accounts and call that an assessment even if they have already wasted 2 hours of your time establishing the facts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Emigre
    replied
    Originally posted by Clippy View Post
    How the fook can there be a outstanding tax debt of £25.8bn?

    It must include fraud e.g VAT carousel fraud.

    If so, is this type of 'debt' really recoverable?

    Its actually only £1000 per member of the working population and there's no comment on how late it is, or whether part of it arises from HMRC's fanciful assessments. Its not split by different tax so we don't know if its individuals or corporates.

    You're right to question whether it is all recoverable. Doubtless amounts included on closure notices for those affected by Section 58 are included, yet that is the subject of a series of court cases the final result of which is unlikely to be determined for years to come.

    I'm sure if we were to see an analysis of the number we would see the full extent of HMRCs incompetence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    How the fook can there be a outstanding tax debt of £25.8bn?

    It must include fraud e.g VAT carousel fraud.

    If so, is this type of 'debt' really recoverable?

    Leave a comment:


  • Menelaus
    replied
    VERY interesting.

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderlizard
    replied
    but if they said anything other than that, they'd need their heads examining.

    Leave a comment:


  • Monster Munch
    started a topic Taxman defends debt retrieval priorities

    Taxman defends debt retrieval priorities

    Interesting:

    http://www.accountancyage.com/accoun...rieval-4727120

Working...
X