• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Being forced to become a contractor"

Collapse

  • centurian
    replied
    Originally posted by PM-Junkie View Post
    WHS. It is so illegal that it probably wouldn't even get to court. Your lawyer would contact their lawyer. Their lawyer would then go to them and say words to the effect of "you did WHAT???????????".

    Sue the buggers.

    I'm pretty sure that if you make someone redundant, then you cannot recruit into that post/role for at least 6 months, otherwise the role is not, by definition, "redundant".

    Now making a permie redundant and taking on a contractor isn't quite so cut and dry. They could argue that they are "outsourcing" it to an external company, therefore the internal resource becomes redundant. But I don't think that would cut it with a judge... so as Junkie says, it wouldn't even get to court.

    It might be worth trying to understand why they are doing this - and it could be as simple as wanting to juggle (fiddle) the finances. Permie "salary" is often considered a revenue expense which must be accounted in full for that financial year, whereas contractor "costs" can be considered capital expenditure and written off over a number of years. So that manager can show how much money he has "saved" the company.




    In the end though, you have to consider what is being offered and weigh that up. If it is a true contractor rate, you may want to go for it. If they basically want to pay you the same amount - just as a contractor, I'd sue them.

    Do the sums carefully. The headline contractor amount may seem like more, but once you factor in holiday/training and especially employers NI (you will almost certainly fall inside IR35 due to doing the same work for a previous salaried employer). You may find out if is about the same amount.



    Hope that helps

    Leave a comment:


  • PM-Junkie
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    I'm amazed that none of your colleagues took advice and pulled their employer up on redundancy rights or at the least breach of employment rights and constructive dismissals via employment tribunals.

    It's entirely possible that you all could get significant payouts if you took them to the tribunals.
    WHS. It is so illegal that it probably wouldn't even get to court. Your lawyer would contact their lawyer. Their lawyer would then go to them and say words to the effect of "you did WHAT???????????".

    Sue the buggers.

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    I'm amazed that none of your colleagues took advice and pulled their employer up on redundancy rights or at the least breach of employment rights and constructive dismissals via employment tribunals.

    It's entirely possible that you all could get significant payouts if you took them to the tribunals.

    And thrown in a discrimination claim for good measure to guarantee they get a decent payout.

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    I'm amazed that none of your colleagues took advice and pulled their employer up on redundancy rights or at the least breach of employment rights and constructive dismissals via employment tribunals.

    It's entirely possible that you all could get significant payouts if you took them to the tribunals.

    Leave a comment:


  • pmeswani
    replied
    Originally posted by teclo View Post
    Well I was just curious and I have a couple of friends that still work there and were forced to do this a month before I was.
    Are they still there?

    Leave a comment:


  • teclo
    replied
    Originally posted by pleomax View Post
    The purpose of your original post was?
    Well I was just curious and I have a couple of friends that still work there and were forced to do this a month before I was.

    Leave a comment:


  • pleomax
    replied
    The purpose of your original post was?

    I had similar happen to me in June this year, but they tried to make me work the three months notice period in my contract I walked three days after they told me i was redundant.

    Been contracting ever since, my bank manager has loved me ever since.....

    Leave a comment:


  • teclo
    replied
    At the time I did say to him that he was effectively making me redundant and that this was my 4 weeks notice. He assured me that I was wrong, that it was going to be mutually beneficial for both myself and the company etc etc. Blah blah.

    That was on the Wednesday, the next day I got a call from an agent about a good contracting position and they set an interview up for the following day.

    The next day I had the interview and at 4:30 on that Friday afternoon I left two letters of resignation and walked out to start my contracting career on the Monday.

    That was in March and I haven't looked back. Well apart from the point where I was benched for 6 weeks at the end of October, but I have another contract to cover me until the middle of January.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cheshire Cat
    replied
    COuldn't agree more with the above posts. they're not "forcing you to become a contractor".
    they're sacking you without due notice or redundancy pay
    OTOH they're also giving you another job.

    Do the maths and see what your best route would be.

    Leave a comment:


  • b0redom
    replied
    Don't forget if you go with option 2, you're likely to be out fairly quickly anyway.....

    Leave a comment:


  • SantaClaus
    replied
    I think you should weigh up:

    1. How much redundancy you will get from permie employer.
    2. What sort of contracting rate you can shaft employer with.
    3. How much you can sue employer for because he has broken the law.

    Take the better of the 3 options.

    Leave a comment:


  • teclo
    replied
    Oh this happened earlier this year, and I left them a couple of days later with a nice shiny new contract for more money somewhere else.

    I was just curious as they forced everyone in the company to become contractors.

    Leave a comment:


  • pmeswani
    replied
    Originally posted by teclo View Post
    If you are a permie, how legal is it for your boss to come to you one day and say "At the end of the month, you will become a contractor. You will then contract your work to us"?
    It's illegal. It's them trying to find a way to get rid of you on the cheap. Tell them that they are effectively sacking you. Go and speak to the Citizens Advice Bureau and get some proper advise on how to progress, and do it quick.

    Leave a comment:


  • b0redom
    replied
    Erm, about 0%. They are effectivly making you redundant with all the legal bits and pieces that entails.

    Leave a comment:


  • pleomax
    replied
    ...OK who walked over the IR35 trolls bridge?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X