Originally posted by xoggoth
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Avoiding CT on loans
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Avoiding CT on loans"
Collapse
-
Cheers, Alfie that's what I understand but was hoping for some wizard cunning wheeze. I suspect there isn't one.
The tax system is basically bizarre that one can work one's butt off, make no money whatever and then get taxed on it.
Leave a comment:
-
The problem is that the original loan is not an expense, it's a balance sheet transfer from creditors to bank. Therefore when you get additional profit there's no expense to offset it against.
In theory you're still keeping 79% of the new profit anyway, so part of the loan can still be repaid.
Also bear in mind that the interest paid on the loan will be taxable income on a personal level.
Leave a comment:
-
Avoiding CT on loans
Well, not on loans exactly but on profits made before significant loans by a director are repaid.
My sister wants our tiny company to provide an expensive product but as it does not have the money to produce it she will provide the finance. As I understand it, we could deduct interest paid to her as an expense (which would be taxable anyway) but not repayment of the principal, that is just a creditor thing.
Seems unreasonable to start paying CT on these profits before the firm has even repaid the capital so any legal ways round it? Not a a contracting thing I know but you lot know some wierd stuff.
Ta for any ideasTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Today 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50
- Cloned again: an umbrella company founder's warning on fraud, JSL and Companies House Jul 15 07:47
- How is JSL bedding in for contractor umbrella companies, 100 days in? Jul 14 07:45

Leave a comment: