Originally posted by diesel
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "How much of your dividends do you withdraw?"
Collapse
-
my accountants only advise that i pay myself a directors fee each week......but i work with other contractors who with different accountants advise use of paying min. wage and occasional divis......
what the best/consenus approach and pro and cons for each, if any?
Leave a comment:
-
Well yes it is well-documented that if you close down a company and re-commence the same trade immediately through a new company that that is ineffective for CGT purposes but that would have applied both under the taper relief regime and the entrepreneurs' relief regime so nothing material has changed there.Originally posted by monkeygeorge View PostInteresting, but I would have thought you could only get away with this if you don't open another company and continue trading as before.
Leave a comment:
-
Interesting, but I would have thought you could only get away with this if you don't open another company and continue trading as before.Originally posted by THEPUMA View PostThe old rules were changed and replaced with entrepreneurs' relief.
Leave a comment:
-
You are assuming that you are earning at the same rate every year. If that is the case then yes you are right. The only point of keeping it in the company is if you anticipate being able to take it out at a lower tax rate later, examples includeOriginally posted by monkeygeorge View PostOK, so you take as much in dividends as you can to keep you below the threshold. So you leave the majority of the dividends in the company account forever to avoid paying tax? Eventually you’re going to withraw those funds, at which point you will exceed the threshold anyway, by a huge amount in one go as opposed to a smaller amount gradually. But the amount you pay in tax is the same, surely. This is what I don’t get.
(1) If you take an extended break from working
(2) If you are due to retire
(3) If you are planning on closing the company and wish to use special relief
(4) If you are unexpectedly sick and cannot work
Etc.. Etc..
If you want/need the money they just take it and pay the extra tax. If you can survive without it and want to take a punt that you might be able to get it out later at a lower tax rate then keep it there.
Leave a comment:
-
I voted salary only - but that's cos there is no tax relief for dividends in Switzerland.
If I was in the UK, I'd take minimum salary for pension, the rest in dividends. And make sure that my contracts were "without IR35".
Any other approach is foolishness.
Leave a comment:
-
Wasn't this loophole abolished in April?Originally posted by THEPUMA View PostYes you may be missing something. If you close the company after a year, you will probably get entrepreneurs' relief on the first £1million of lifetime gains (so £2m if you're married - there's no proposal for a CGT equivalent of the income shifting rules) meaning that the extraction cost will be <10% as opposed to 25% if taken by way of dividend on an arising basis.
Leave a comment:
-
OK, so you take as much in dividends as you can to keep you below the threshold. So you leave the majority of the dividends in the company account forever to avoid paying tax? Eventually you’re going to withraw those funds, at which point you will exceed the threshold anyway, by a huge amount in one go as opposed to a smaller amount gradually. But the amount you pay in tax is the same, surely. This is what I don’t get.Originally posted by Lewis View PostIn answer to both these questions. For dividends that do not put you into the higher rate bracket you have no additional tax to pay on self assessment. For the rest you need to pay additional tax at self assessment. So (a) is to avoid extra tax and (b) the consequences are you will pay extra tax.
Leave a comment:
-
It's been debated to death. I currently take out most of my profit each month, leaving enough there to cover the company bills and a bit. Then I take what I have drawn and put most of it into a personal savings account to gain the interest.Originally posted by THEPUMA View Post
Lewis, as you say it's been debated before but the advice to restrict your dividends to quarterly is nonsense.
At some point, there'll be enough there for me not to need to take it out monthly, but I'll see what I do when I get to that point.
And yes, I appreciate I will pay more tax annually doing it this way, but this is the path I have knowingly decided to take...
Leave a comment:
-
Yes you may be missing something. If you close the company after a year, you will probably get entrepreneurs' relief on the first £1million of lifetime gains (so £2m if you're married - there's no proposal for a CGT equivalent of the income shifting rules) meaning that the extraction cost will be <10% as opposed to 25% if taken by way of dividend on an arising basis.Originally posted by monkeygeorge View PostI've heard mixed views on the best approach, however I see little benefit in keeping funds in your company, either you take the dividends and get taxed on a regular basis, or you take it some point in the future and get taxed heavily then?
I understand it's no longer possible to close your company after two years to withdraw the funds without incurring the tax.
Am I missing something, other then making yourself a target for a contractor working as a permie?
The majority of my clients restrict their dividends to the amount they can take out as dividends without incurring higher rate tax although I suspect cashflow will not allow this to continue if we are unable to navigate our way around the income shifting rules come next April.
Lewis, as you say it's been debated before but the advice to restrict your dividends to quarterly is nonsense.
Leave a comment:
-
You can take a tax free director's loan of up to £5K. Maybe bin the dividend minutes and instead put it in your accounts as a director's loan. Later declare a £5K dividend that clears the loan. But get advice from your accountant.Originally posted by lambrini_socialist View Posti've had no advice on that from my accountant (i haven't asked, to be fair).
perhaps i'll, um, "amend" my minutes (with the aid of a box of matches)
i totally hear you, but going Ltd takes some getting used to and TBH i feel i'm doing a pretty good job so far! these frequent, small dividends i'm declaring are more down to a general sense of financial cautiousness than a lack of planning. some readjustment in my thinking probably required though.
Leave a comment:
-
In answer to both these questions. For dividends that do not put you into the higher rate bracket you have no additional tax to pay on self assessment. For the rest you need to pay additional tax at self assessment. So (a) is to avoid extra tax and (b) the consequences are you will pay extra tax.Originally posted by monkeygeorge View PostBut why not take it now and invest in a high interest account, rather than leave it in your company account. What good is it doing there?
What do you mean no further taxation consequences if you draw it at a later date?
Leave a comment:
-
i've had no advice on that from my accountant (i haven't asked, to be fair).Originally posted by Lewis View PostWow! I've always been advised by my accountants to declare dividends at most quarterly to avoid them being classified as income. It's been debated here a few times as to whether monthly dividends are ok or not.
perhaps i'll, um, "amend" my minutes (with the aid of a box of matches)
i totally hear you, but going Ltd takes some getting used to and TBH i feel i'm doing a pretty good job so far! these frequent, small dividends i'm declaring are more down to a general sense of financial cautiousness than a lack of planning. some readjustment in my thinking probably required though.But jeez, can you not plan ahead a week!Last edited by lambrini_socialist; 9 September 2008, 16:04.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Leave a comment: