• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Removal of schedule E expenses for "temporary" staff."

Collapse

  • Waldorf
    replied
    Originally posted by Svalbaard View Post
    Apologies if this has been answered elsewhere, but I was just wondering if this is correct, and/or if anyone had any further or more detailed information on it.

    Many thanks.
    Like here? http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...as-doomed.html

    Leave a comment:


  • Zen Contracting
    replied
    This has come about because a lot of umbrella companies have been abusing the dispensations given to them by HMRC.

    A dispensation means that the employer (in this case the umbrella company) does not have to file a P11D for each of its employees if their expenses remain below the level of the agreed dispensation. It does not mean that a contractor can claim a flat rate of expenses and it does not mean that the contractor does not have to keep receipts to back up expense claims. However some of the less professional umbrella companies have been encouraging contractors to claim a flat rate of expense even if that flat rate bears no relationship to the actual amount of expense incurred.

    You can sort of see HMRC's view point on this matter. Lets hope the unprofessional few don't spoil it for the majority who play by the rules.

    David.

    Leave a comment:


  • NotAllThere
    replied
    This one?

    Of course the simplest way to make it fair to everyone, would be to allow permies to also claim home to office travel as a deductable expense. Like in much of Europe.
    Last edited by NotAllThere; 2 September 2008, 10:33.

    Leave a comment:


  • Svalbaard
    started a topic Removal of schedule E expenses for "temporary" staff.

    Removal of schedule E expenses for "temporary" staff.

    I've just had a chat with a colleague of mine who mentioned in passing that there is an HMRC consultation out, the purpose of which is to decide on removing the ability of temporary workers to claim schedule E expenses such as mileage and subsistence allowances.

    Apologies if this has been answered elsewhere, but I was just wondering if this is correct, and/or if anyone had any further or more detailed information on it.

    Many thanks.
Working...
X