I was in the Montepelier scheme for about 2 years. So, fortunately the tax liability isnt too great since I didnt work continuously during that period.
Still, its a worry all the same especially sinceHMRC appear to have done nothing except ask the same questions every 9 months or so ie when did you enter the scheme, when did you leave, submit accounts for the period etc, etc?
I've often wondered why HMRC has delayed making a decision on the scheme and there can only be two reasons;
1, they think the chances of winning any test case is 50 \ 50 at best
2, they are waiting for some retrospectic power to come into force.
Surprise, surprise, I now see the government is bringing in retrospective finance legislation in July this year which will have the effect of outlawing schemes or similar schemes at a stroke!
I've held off paying any money on account and TBH, MTM or whatever they call thmesleves nowadays, are fecking useless at keeping you up to date with what's happening and more importantly, lessening your tax penalties! That last bit is surprising since they claimed to be about lessening your tax burden if you joined their fecking scheme!
What's the concensus of opinion from informed former members of the scheme, pay on account, make a payment based on one of the other options (if so which) ir sit tight (not really an option now as it drags on and on!)?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Montpelier vs. HMRC - Contingency Options"
Collapse
-
Your all right, I wasnt being entirely serious, but I thought the irony of HMRC driving me back into the arms of an avoidance scheme delicious...
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostOh, I know - IR35. Nonsense, not a consideration. Go LtdCo regardless.
Mal is right. There is much less risk of getting investigated with a Ltd Co than if you are in a scheme. Even if your working practises would technically be deemed employment, the chances of getting caught are very slim. After 7 years, IR35 has proved to be largely ineffective.
Leave a comment:
-
Oh, I know - IR35. Nonsense, not a consideration. Go LtdCo regardless.
Mal is right. There is much less risk of getting investigated with a Ltd Co than if you are in a scheme. Even if your working practises would technically be deemed employment, the chances of getting caught are very slim. After 7 years, IR35 has proved to be largely ineffective.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by poppy01 View PostGiven the ongoing discussion on the other thread re rejoining Montpelier, which it would appear is a loan scheme that so far hasnt been attacked and may or may not be attacked retrospectively (who knows these days) , I think a legitimate option should be added of rejoining MP, and putting every extra penny into a CTD to pay the BN66 bill. There may or may not be a later issue re the loan scheme but that's something to worry about later. Its not ideal but might help with the immediate problem.
You can't be serious. But you could end up in even WORSE a situation. For what a few thousand pounds. My thoughts are here on the other BN66 thread ... http://forums.contractoruk.com/587038-post970.html
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by malvolio View PostDon't follow the logic at all. Use MP to sort the curent mess, but why start a whole new one? Andif all you're going to do with your "saved" tax is lock it away for 20 years just in case, why not get your own company, save the tax legitimately and get some benefit from it. At least then you'd be on fairly stable legal ground.
Oh, I know - IR35. Nonsense, not a consideration. Go LtdCo regardless.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by poppy01 View PostGiven the ongoing discussion on the other thread re rejoining Montpelier, which it would appear is a loan scheme that so far hasnt been attacked and may or may not be attacked retrospectively (who knows these days) , I think a legitimate option should be added of rejoining MP, and putting every extra penny into a CTD to pay the BN66 bill. There may or may not be a later issue re the loan scheme but that's something to worry about later. Its not ideal but might help with the immediate problem.
Oh, I know - IR35. Nonsense, not a consideration. Go LtdCo regardless.
Leave a comment:
-
additonal option
Given the ongoing discussion on the other thread re rejoining Montpelier, which it would appear is a loan scheme that so far hasnt been attacked and may or may not be attacked retrospectively (who knows these days) , I think a legitimate option should be added of rejoining MP, and putting every extra penny into a CTD to pay the BN66 bill. There may or may not be a later issue re the loan scheme but that's something to worry about later. Its not ideal but might help with the immediate problem.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostAnd think of the pleasure you will give Mr Brannigan. Don't give the sick puppy the satisfaction.
He is 'just doing his job', an argument which, I believe , has been used before.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostSadly, I think you may be right. If the guy I knew did it for a few hundred quid...
I wouldn't be surprised if there are a few family breakups as well.
It is easy to say "it's only money" but it's often the cause of most problems in relationships. Fortunately, I'm lucky in this department as my wife is completely blase about the whole thing. She always thought it was a bit dodgy but reckoned it was worth a punt.
If you ever want to talk PM me. Same goes for anyone else. Talk to someone before you contemplate anything drastic. There are friends here who will listen.
If there is anyone reading this who is approaching a bad state - remember that we have not lost anything yet. And there are plenty of better alternatives. Talk to DR or me - I can be PMed or emailed. There is always a solution.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by poppy01 View PostI would never do that, think of the inconvenience caused to all those people.
My suggestion is not entirely in jest, it really has crossed my mind, but I'm too much the coward. I suspect though that at least one of us will if it goes against us.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by poppy01 View PostI would never do that, think of the inconvenience caused to all those people.
My suggestion is not entirely in jest, it really has crossed my mind, but I'm too much the coward. I suspect though that at least one of us will if it goes against us.
I wouldn't be surprised if there are a few family breakups as well.
It is easy to say "it's only money" but it's often the cause of most problems in relationships. Fortunately, I'm lucky in this department as my wife is completely blase about the whole thing. She always thought it was a bit dodgy but reckoned it was worth a punt.
If you ever want to talk PM me. Same goes for anyone else. Talk to someone before you contemplate anything drastic. There are friends here who will listen.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View PostNot even in jest would I add that to the list.
I knew someone who committed suicide earlier this year over money worries. He'd run up a few debts on credit cards but the final tipping point was an unauthorised overdraft of £50 which incurred bank charges. The guy threw himself off a bridge into an oncoming train, and left a wife and 4 kids. The family were absolutely devastated.
My suggestion is not entirely in jest, it really has crossed my mind, but I'm too much the coward. I suspect though that at least one of us will if it goes against us.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: