• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Quick 40% tax question"

Collapse

  • MrRobin
    replied
    It shouldn't affect the position of the upper rate threshold at all (except that it has gone up a wee bit, as it does every year) since the income that used to be taxed at 10% is now taxed at 20%

    In other words, the 20% (used to be 22%) band has got 'wider' to fill the gap the 10% has left, rather than the upper rate threshold dropping.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruprect
    replied
    Originally posted by malvolio View Post
    But what about the abolition of the 10% band. Won't that move the threshold around a bit?
    Good question! one for the accountants methinks

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    But what about the abolition of the 10% band. Won't that move the threshold around a bit?

    Leave a comment:


  • gadgetman
    replied
    Thanks for the replies, all clear now.

    Leave a comment:


  • ASB
    replied
    Originally posted by gadgetman View Post
    Thanks, just as well I asked!

    Can you elaborate on where 22.5% comes from? I'd assumed I pay the difference between basic rate and 40%, hence my guess at 18%.
    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/saimmanual/SAIM1080.htm
    http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/rates/it.htm


    Actually the higher savings rate is 32.5% but you get the 10% credit

    It works out at 40% being paid overall in the mix between normal rate CT and the higher rate savings tax paid.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrRobin
    replied
    Paying tax on dividend income
    If you pay tax at or below the basic rate
    You have no tax to pay on your dividend income because the tax liability is 10 per cent - the same amount as the tax credit - as shown in the tables.
    If you pay tax at the higher rate
    You pay a total of 32.5% tax on dividend income that falls above the basic rate Income Tax limit (£34,600 for the 2007-2008 tax year). But because the first 10 per cent of the tax due on your dividend income is already covered by the tax credit, in practice you owe only 22.5 per cent.
    Linky

    Leave a comment:


  • gadgetman
    replied
    Thanks, just as well I asked!

    Can you elaborate on where 22.5% comes from? I'd assumed I pay the difference between basic rate and 40%, hence my guess at 18%.

    Leave a comment:


  • MrRobin
    replied
    Quick 40% tax answer

    Your threshold calculation is correct, but the extra amount payable is 22.5%, not 18%

    Leave a comment:


  • gadgetman
    started a topic Quick 40% tax question

    Quick 40% tax question

    Just got my PAYE return and I’m trying to estimate my personal tax liability for 2006/07 i.e. the additional tax in the 40% band.

    From previous posts here I get the threshold at which the 40% rate starts for net dividends as:

    (40% threshold + personal tax allowance – PAYE) * 0.9 which comes out at:

    (34600 + 5225 – 10750 ) * 0.9 = £26,167.50

    Therefore any net dividends above this figure are subject to 18% tax. Is this correct?

Working...
X