Originally posted by monkeyboy
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Running a Vehicle through Company
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Running a Vehicle through Company"
Collapse
-
As stated, stinking Brownstuff has put BIK up to £3000 plus another £500 on fuel if you have any significant personal use. I believe you can still take it and keep it at home and have a couple of minor personal trips without incurring the BIK.
Leave a comment:
-
No if you pay the tax on the BIK there are no restrictions on private use.Originally posted by monkeyboy View PostThanks puma. So what you are saying is that whether the comapany buys a van or not is upto the directors of the comapany and as long as the BIK is payed to IR for private use thats all that should affect the IR
Does it say anywhere about limitations of use. I.e. if the van is used 95% private and 5% business use is this not allowed.
Think I'm going to have to ask my accountants this.
Basically this has come up because I have a hobby/sport that requires a large vehicle. I have a Discovery at the moment and even with roof rack etc is proving too small. I also have a very large caravan so require a vehicle that can tow it. Hence the van idea (people carriers just don't have the towing capacity) and have it as our only vehicle.
Even with 3000 pound BIK it will probably be cheaper to use the van and with fuel added it could well be alot cheaper. as Ithe company can claim the vat back on all fuel, as long as I spend more than 500 pounds a year on fuel it will work out cheaper through the company.
My biggest concern was if the IR had a limitation of the ammount of use of the vehicle ie must be more business uses than private.
Seems like a nice loophole similar to running a company bike as you can still claim the vat back, cars are less effective as the company cannot claim the vat back.
If private use were "incidental", you can get away with no BIK but it doesn't sound like that will be defensible in your case.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks puma. So what you are saying is that whether the comapany buys a van or not is upto the directors of the comapany and as long as the BIK is payed to IR for private use thats all that should affect the IR
Does it say anywhere about limitations of use. I.e. if the van is used 95% private and 5% business use is this not allowed.
Think I'm going to have to ask my accountants this.
Basically this has come up because I have a hobby/sport that requires a large vehicle. I have a Discovery at the moment and even with roof rack etc is proving too small. I also have a very large caravan so require a vehicle that can tow it. Hence the van idea (people carriers just don't have the towing capacity) and have it as our only vehicle.
Even with 3000 pound BIK it will probably be cheaper to use the van and with fuel added it could well be alot cheaper. as Ithe company can claim the vat back on all fuel, as long as I spend more than 500 pounds a year on fuel it will work out cheaper through the company.
My biggest concern was if the IR had a limitation of the ammount of use of the vehicle ie must be more business uses than private.
Seems like a nice loophole similar to running a company bike as you can still claim the vat back, cars are less effective as the company cannot claim the vat back.
Leave a comment:
-
Although the BIK has increased to £3,000/£3,500, that doesn't necessarily make it uncommercial to run through your company.
I would say that for most circumstances it would be better owned through the company than personally but you need to crunch the numbers.
Leave a comment:
-
A bulldozer is the best thing to run through a company - they do far more damage than a mere van can (unless it's been modified like the A-Team).Originally posted by monkeyboy View PostDoes anyone here run a van through there company. Lease or purchase.
Has anyone had any problems with this from the IR.
Cheers
HTH.
Leave a comment:
-
Quick google and find that the 500 is now 3000 and hence not economical as it will be predominently for private use.
Suppose that was to catch all the people using Double cab pickups as there company car.
Leave a comment:
-
My understanding is that if the vehicle is classed as commercial, you can claim vat on purchase running costs.
And just pay 500 benifit in kind for personnel use of vehicle.
This will not work with cars but commercial vehicles are treated differently.
I think the 500 has change in the last buget is that what makes it un economical.
Leave a comment:
-
Depends what your business is. If your an IT contractor general consensus is no you cant.
Leave a comment:
-
Running a Vehicle through Company
Does anyone here run a van through there company. Lease or purchase.
Has anyone had any problems with this from the IR.
CheersTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers


Leave a comment: