• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Arctic case

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Arctic case"

Collapse

  • malvolio
    replied
    The courts, quite possibly. Some of the judgements rendered so far in Arctic have defied logic, and one was made in violation of accepted practice by one of the early defenders of IR35, so we have to be a little scpetical

    The Law Lords are a different beast. The main judgement being challenged is that unanimous one from the last High Court Appeal, that if HMRC want to re-apply the legislation in this novel manner, they must go back to Parliament to seek sanction for it. Or, to put it bluntly, there is no legal basis for the demands they are making on Arctic Systems (and by inference about a million similar small businesses).

    However, nothing is certain. We - and not just freelances, the UK as a whole - will be badly affected if HMRC win.

    Leave a comment:


  • oxtailsoup
    replied
    May be I've watched too many episodes of John Deed but I always believe that if the government need to push something through the courts then they will succeed.

    Hope I'm wrong!

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    I heard "a few weeks" from the Law Lord's own website.

    It is nobody's interest to delay it and the debate is about pure points of law, not advocacy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruprect
    replied
    I heard October 19th, from a guy who also tried to sell me some magic beans.

    Leave a comment:


  • THEPUMA
    replied
    I heard September from someone knowledgeable.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Wrong. Judgements from HoL appeals are usually quite swift - expect to see them within a few weeks, usually on a Thursday morning.

    Leave a comment:


  • Darren@UptonAccountants
    replied
    Arctic

    Completely rumour, but heard on the grapevine last month that the decision would be delayed until Autumn time but no specific date.

    Just rumour, came from an inspector on whilst on a course last month.
    Last edited by Darren@UptonAccountants; 4 June 2007, 15:11.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lewis
    started a topic Arctic case

    Arctic case

    The Arctic case is due to be heard tomorrow in the House of Lords. But a decision is not expected for some considerable time Anyone with a bit of knowledge about these things care to take a guess how long this will be? I am holding off dividends awaiting the outcome. Want to gift wife some shares if Artic win.

Working...
X