Reply to: For Simon@SJD Re: Shout99 Post

[Old Greg]

beerbarrel is 'the One'

Who gets to be Trinity?

[bangface]

beerbarrel is actually Simon's self-destructive alter ego. It's a dark tale.

beerbarrel is 'the One'

[Old Greg]

FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT

beerbarrel is actually Simon's self-destructive alter ego. It's a dark tale.

[bangface]

Why can't you two play nicely like contractors?

FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT, FIGHT

[Old Greg]

Hmm - for someone who claims to be a qualified accountant you are particuarly ignorant over tax matters.

Again, I would urge you to consider your position quite carefully.

The Inland Revenue have quite clearly provided me with all the confirmation we need which quite clearly shows SJD, and the likes of other genuine accountants to be outside of the legislation. I've also shared this information with people on this forum.

It is obvious from your posts under this alias and the others you have that your only intent on this forum is to descredit SJD - something I would of course expect from one of our competitors.

Why can't you two play nicely like contractors?

[simondolan]

Unfortunately Simon I don't work for P4 so you can't discredit me that way can you?

My remarks are not libellous, particularly as you confirmed that you did offer an MSC solution. That is precisely why I rejected the opportunity of going down the limited company route with SJD, I believe you are an MSC Provider and therefore too high risk.

Never thought I would agree with Giant again but to their credit they seem to have a better grasp than SJD.

Hmm - for someone who claims to be a qualified accountant you are particuarly ignorant over tax matters.

Again, I would urge you to consider your position quite carefully.

The Inland Revenue have quite clearly provided me with all the confirmation we need which quite clearly shows SJD, and the likes of other genuine accountants to be outside of the legislation. I've also shared this information with people on this forum.

It is obvious from your posts under this alias and the others you have that your only intent on this forum is to descredit SJD - something I would of course expect from one of our competitors.

[beerbarrel]

Thank goodness for that. I'd been up all night worrying about how to justify myself to you.

Anyway, how is life over at P4 these days. Quiet I hear?

Also, you might like to edit your last comment- it is libellous.

Unfortunately Simon I don't work for P4 so you can't discredit me that way can you?

My remarks are not libellous, particularly as you confirmed that you did offer an MSC solution. That is precisely why I rejected the opportunity of going down the limited company route with SJD, I believe you are an MSC Provider and therefore too high risk.

Never thought I would agree with Giant again but to their credit they seem to have a better grasp than SJD.

[beerbarrel]

[QUOTE=chubba]LOL - for a contractor you only seem bothered about MSC stuff and knocking NW and SJD. Troll alert! Come on, tell us what you really do... You are from one of the seedy MSCs aren't you?

Sorry,chubby I am simply a contractor, albeit a qualified accountant. You will see from my posts that I was with Giant Powerhouse. Not wishing to jump from frying pan, etc I have researched the topic and spoken to my local tax office - status team.

I am not going to be bullied by a dope like you.

[simondolan]

Unfortunately just a contractor, not a competitor.

Incidentally Simon, there is no need to justify your position to me, it's the HMRC status inspectors you need to worry about.

Thank goodness for that. I'd been up all night worrying about how to justify myself to you.

Anyway, how is life over at P4 these days. Quiet I hear?

Also, you might like to edit your last comment- it is libellous.

[chubba]

LOL - for a contractor you only seem bothered about MSC stuff and knocking NW and SJD. Troll alert! Come on, tell us what you really do... You are from one of the seedy MSCs aren't you?

beerbarrel's interests

[beerbarrel]

Unfortunately just a contractor, not a competitor.

Just trying to keep you honest.

Incidentally Simon, there is no need to justify your position to me, it's the HMRC status inspectors you need to worry about. You naughty little rebadged MSC provider.

[simondolan]

Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't SJD provide an MSC solution? I think it was called SJD Solutions - or SJD Total Solutions.

Does that make SJD a rebadged MSC provider?

We did provide a small number of clients with a service which could be defined as an MSC, yes. However we only ever did around 40 of these, out of a total client base of around 5500.

They were incidental and insignificant to our core business which means that the legislation could not apply to us as we were not "in the business of providing MSC's"

Nice to know the competition keep such a close eye on us

[beerbarrel]

(provided of course you have a proper firm of accountants acting for you and not a rebadged MSC provider)

Correct me if I am wrong, but didn't SJD provide an MSC solution? I think it was called SJD Solutions - or SJD Total Solutions.

Does that make SJD a rebadged MSC provider?

[Limited]

I've not really been following the whole MSC thing as I've running a ltd for the last 3 years.

However, my accountant has always acted as my company secretary. Is that not ok now?

Also recently found out that my accountant was also providing MSCs as well if that makes a difference.

Thanks

[Lewis]

Hi,

If all they did was set the Company up for you, and never had any control over the bank account or acted as a Company director/secretary then you will be fine to continue to run with the Company (provided of course you have a proper firm of accountants acting for you and not a rebadged MSC provider)

Phew! Thanks for replying. Much appreciated.