Originally posted by Denny
What annoys me here is that as a director I am obliged to do whatever it takes to protect my company, yet if what you say is true then my "penalty" turns into MOO yet when other companies do it, it is a legitimate business practice.
I do not claim to be a lawyer, nor do I claim to be an IR35 expert, but I do claim to have an understanding of what I am doing.
All this conversation is proving is what a disgrace IR35 actualy is.
The view taken by the IR is not a normal view, it is wholey and deliberately twisted to prove the revenues point rather than to look at the reality which it purports to do.
If I sold 10,000 widgets at a reduced rate, then the customer decided he only wanted 1,000 I would be entitled to charge him the normal rate for 1,000.
If I sell a customer 1800 hours at 35 per hour instead of the usual 40 and the cutomer then decides he only wants 900 hours I should be able to adjust the rate accordingly.
It is all about viewpoints.
Leave a comment: