Originally posted by Darren at Fox-Bartfield
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "IP for MVL recommendations or experiences"
Collapse
-
SFP Recommendation: Re Darren Roberts Post
-
Originally posted by Demo View PostOut of interest, what makes 4 shareholders more complicated than 2 if the only asset is cash?
I appreciate there could easily be the counter question "well, why 2, why not just do 1 shareholder companies...surely that would be easier?". Well, yes it would. However there are a lot of jointly owned companies, typically spouses. Being able to cater to 1-2 shareholder companies rather than just 1 shareholder probably doubles our market, so we felt it was worth it to be flexible to them despite it adding complications our end. Expanding from 1-2 to 4 wouldn't have anywhere near the same positive impact.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Maslins View PostSorry it's not one MVL Online can do. The licensed IP behind MVLO would no doubt be able to do it from his mainstream practice Traverse Advisory, but cost would be quite a bit higher (perhaps £2.5k-3k plus the normal costs). The process would be a bit different (more bespoke, less template based) to MVLO's, but in terms of risk it's the same legal bod responsible so he gets my endorsement for integrity/reliability etc.
Otherwise, pains me to say this...but have you had a look at some of MVLO's direct competitors? Perhaps one of the "cheap and cheerful" online brigade may be a bit more flexible about multiple shareholders. If I name them here I'll come out in a nasty rash...but Google "MVL" and you'll see a fair few other online firms. Obviously check their criteria, some may have the same restrictions we have, others may be more flexible.
I have been looking at a number of insolvency companies but there is little feedback to be had. A recommendation is always good to have, even if it's on an internet forum.
Thanks to the others who have replied.
Leave a comment:
-
Sorry it's not one MVL Online can do. The licensed IP behind MVLO would no doubt be able to do it from his mainstream practice Traverse Advisory, but cost would be quite a bit higher (perhaps £2.5k-3k plus the normal costs). The process would be a bit different (more bespoke, less template based) to MVLO's, but in terms of risk it's the same legal bod responsible so he gets my endorsement for integrity/reliability etc.
Otherwise, pains me to say this...but have you had a look at some of MVLO's direct competitors? Perhaps one of the "cheap and cheerful" online brigade may be a bit more flexible about multiple shareholders. If I name them here I'll come out in a nasty rash...but Google "MVL" and you'll see a fair few other online firms. Obviously check their criteria, some may have the same restrictions we have, others may be more flexible.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Demo View PostHi,
After 5 years of contracting I'm looking to retire and close the company. I'm interested in recommendations for, or against, Insolvency Practitioners for an MVL.
There are 4 shareholders (business partner and spouses) so MVL Online can't help unfortunately. Only assets will be cash at the bank.
I had a quick scan of the forums but any similar threads appear to be several years old and I didn't want to resurrect them.
Any feedback on companies would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
[email protected]
Leave a comment:
-
IP for MVL recommendations or experiences
Hi,
After 5 years of contracting I'm looking to retire and close the company. I'm interested in recommendations for, or against, Insolvency Practitioners for an MVL.
There are 4 shareholders (business partner and spouses) so MVL Online can't help unfortunately. Only assets will be cash at the bank.
I had a quick scan of the forums but any similar threads appear to be several years old and I didn't want to resurrect them.
Any feedback on companies would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Spot the hidden contractor Today 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Yesterday 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Yesterday 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Yesterday 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Yesterday 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Yesterday 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
- Why limited company working could be back in vogue in 2025 Dec 16 09:45
- Expert Accounting for Contractors: Trusted by thousands Dec 12 14:47
Leave a comment: