Originally posted by kaiser78
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Pensions.....Why bother?
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Pensions.....Why bother?"
Collapse
-
-
Some useful info on here from Freelancer Financials.
I have a related query to this discussion which maybe FF can give their view;
I have been running a Skandia funds MultiISA for the past couple of years. However the charges/commisison fees every time I make a contribution is 3% to my IFA and 1.5% to Skandia.
Now, my IFA does monitor the funds every 6 months and investment changes where necessary, but paying 4.5% charges/commisisons each time I make a payment sees excessively high ? Is it ?
Thanks
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by moorfield View PostI think you're off your target audience a little, many on here know all that already.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by moorfield View PostHear hear.
And IMO there is no need to go into funds at all, I now choose to buy shares directly via both SIPP and ISA wrappers. I also believe the t'internet is the best and cheapest IFA one can find.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Freelancer Financials View PostSome facts about pensions:
When you retire, if you wish, you can take 25% of the money as a lump sum completely tax free. With the rest of the money there are various options:
* Skimming: you can take income from your fund based on specific limits
each year relative to the size of the fund.
John
ok so 25% at 55....what are the rules on skimming? Does it attract personal income tax at normal rates?
Don't really see a need to go down the winding up company and paying 10% - captial gains allowance unless u really have to. May as well just continue to drain about 36K per yr in salary and dividends.
Ta Oliver
Leave a comment:
-
Some Quick Facts About Pensions
Originally posted by Olly View Postjust a quicky....you know you can take 25% tax free from pension fund when you reach a certain age....
can you remind me what the age is and if it's due to change?
...also I seem to remember you don't have to buy an annuity and can continue to take out tax free amounts from the fund - does that sound right?
thanks
1. Pensions aren't all about saving money to buy an annuity. 25% of your funds can be drawn tax-free from age 50 (55 for younger investors). And rather than buying a rigid annuity, you can leave funds invested and simply skim an income from the pension pot each year.
2. You no longer pay large portions of your payments in commissions to an IFA - commissions are negligible - comparable to buying a tracker fund.
3. Your savings can be passed on to your family if you die before age 75 - provided you've not bought an annuity. The money will not be subject to inheritance tax.
4. Your funds are perfectly safe as pensions funds cannot become
insolvent. A private pension fund is carefully protected by law.
When you retire, if you wish, you can take 25% of the money as a lump sum completely tax free. With the rest of the money there are various options:
* Skimming: you can take income from your fund based on specific limits
each year relative to the size of the fund.
* Annuities: You must purchase these at age 75, but you need not before
that age.
* Inheritance: You can leave your pension to your heirs--it is not subject to
inheritance tax if you die before you retire.
(If you die after retirement age, but before you take an annuity, you can still leave the funds to your heirs but there are taxes to pay.)
Your Options At Age 50 (or 55 after 2010)
You may, if you choose, start enjoying pension benefits from the age of 50, but from 2010, this will rise to 55. Nonetheless, you will have access to your money at a relatively young age and lots of time to enjoy it. You can take 25% of your money in a tax-free lump at this age (or later if you wish). It doesn't matter whether or not you have actually retired or are still working.
At Age 75
At age 75, you must use your pension funds to buy an annuity, or enter something called an alternatively secured pension.
An annuity is a policy that provides a regular income in exchange for a lump sum. It's not a high rate-paying investment and usually returns around 5%.
But it does ensure you a regular income as you mature. You should explore other tax and inheritance options at that point with an accountant or tax lawyer, but you will have many more lower-tax possibilities thanks to your pension investment.
I hope that helps.
John
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Olly View Postjust a quicky....you know you can take 25% tax free from pension fund when you reach a certain age....
can you remind me what the age is and if it's due to change?
...also I seem to remember you don't have to buy an annuity and can continue to take out tax free amounts from the fund - does that sound right?
thanks
And yes, you can take the lump sum, but don't have to take an annuity. You can let it grow, put more in, or take a drawdown (which is taxable and limited in each year)
Leave a comment:
-
just a quicky....you know you can take 25% tax free from pension fund when you reach a certain age....
can you remind me what the age is and if it's due to change?
...also I seem to remember you don't have to buy an annuity and can continue to take out tax free amounts from the fund - does that sound right?
thanks
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by moorfield View PostHear hear.
And IMO there is no need to go into funds at all, I now choose to buy shares directly via both SIPP and ISA wrappers. I also believe the t'internet is the best and cheapest IFA one can find.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kaiser78 View PostAlso why is now a good time to invest in BTL even with IR being low but a saturation of BTL properties remaining empty from what is read ?
Thanks.
"Good news for property investors as rental figures rise again.
There has been a rise in rental figures for the second consecutive month this year according to figures released by Belvoir, the independent specialist letting agency."
“Belvoir has over 140 franchises nationwide and the Belvoir rental index figures for September 2009 shows that the small but significant upturn in rental figures we noted in August has continued for a second month,” confirmed Mike Goddard, CEO of Belvoir. “Our latest figures show a 0.6 percent rise on a month by month basis, which equates to a 7 percent annual increase.
After months of slow decline in rents, totalling about 6 percent, the September figures confirm that the trend does now appear to have reversed and we are cautiously optimistic that this signifies the end of the ‘reluctant landlord’ and a return to normality in the rental market.”
It all depends on what you read. The above report is positive but tomorrow you could read another report saying something different.
The only way to really know what is going on in the BTL market is speak to friends and family who are landlords.
My personal opinion is that this is a good time to invest in a BTL property as long as you have a minimum deposit of 25 to 30 percent.
John
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostI'm in the "Ltd Co funded SIPP" camp myself. There is no need to go into funds run by poor managers.
And IMO there is no need to go into funds at all, I now choose to buy shares directly via both SIPP and ISA wrappers. I also believe the t'internet is the best and cheapest IFA one can find.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by kaiser78 View PostMy FA has suggested to invest in equity ISAs instead of pensions, as the tax breaks cancel each other out - one taxed on entry the other on exit, but I can still access the funds if I need them in the future in the ISA route. Is this a recommendable way to proceed ?
Thanks.
ISAs unlike pensions, don't attract the same upfront tax boost but as you pointed out are far more flexible in the way you can take out your money.
You can invest up to £7,200 every year in ISAs and the total amount saved can build quickly. ISAs are offered by most major financial institutions and you can choose which option suits you best, although it is generally best to seek the advice of an independent financial adviser.
However, ISAs are funded by your post-tax income, whereas pensions can be funded using limited company income. But again as you rightly pointed out there is no tax payable on the income received from ISA investments.
ISA's are great if you start them young and take a long term view. The one drawback is that you are limited to a maximum investment of £7200 in any given year.
With a pension you can contribute 'pre-taxed' company income from your limited company. If you are a higher rate tax payer, instead of declaring the income as company profit and taking the income as a dividend, you can put the same sum straight into a pension.
For example: You have £100 worth of company income, and you are a higher rate tax payer, not caught by IR35. You can either put the £100 into a pension, or you can declare it as profit and take it as a dividend.
But if you choose the latter option and take a dividend payment, you pay:
1. £21 in corporate tax on your £100, leaving £79
2. 22.5% personal income tax on the dividend, which takes another £17.78
3. Your total take home is £61.
Choosing the pensions option means that the whole £100 goes into a pension fund and then has an opportunity to grow in a tax efficient environment. In reality £25 of your contribution represents the part of the pension fund which you can draw tax free when you are retired. £36 of your money also goes into the pension fund, together with the £39 that would have gone to the taxman (quite a decent initial 'return' on your £36). This £75 can also grow and be used to skim off an income at a later date, or buy an annuity.
I can not tell you which way to proceed as I do not know enough about your personal circumstances. Hopefully the above information will give you enough information to help you make the right choice.
John Yerou
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Olly View Posthear hear...a tax break contractors can make use of is their company making chunky pension contributions ....but you all knew that already and you definitely knew about the cutting edge advice above!
p.s. I'm in the sod pensions group - relying on drawing down dividends from ltd until nowt left....whilst 21% is corporation tax saving is nothing to scoff at the downsides of tying up your cash in possibly poorly performing fund and then having restricted options what to do with it at retirement plus essentially not being able to touch it until then all add it to a pension not being as attractive is the headline tax saving. IMHO
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fred Bloggs View PostLet's get things straight here- They are NOT "tax breaks that contractors can make use of". They are tax breaks ANYONE can make use of.
p.s. I'm in the sod pensions group - relying on drawing down dividends from ltd until nowt left....whilst 21% is corporation tax saving is nothing to scoff at the downsides of tying up your cash in possibly poorly performing fund and then having restricted options what to do with it at retirement plus essentially not being able to touch it until then all add it to a pension not being as attractive is the headline tax saving. IMHO
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Reports of umbrella companies’ death are greatly exaggerated Yesterday 10:11
- A new hiring fraud hinges on a limited company, a passport and ‘Ade’ Nov 27 09:21
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Nov 26 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Nov 25 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
Leave a comment: