Originally posted by Ardesco
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "IR35-friendly company suggesting legal action for non-exclusive working..."
Collapse
-
Have they said why they are getting all upset about this?
If you did all the work on time and it does what it was supposed to do and they are hapy with it what is thier problem? Have they got financial difficulties and are using this as an excuse to hold off paying you?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ASBThey can dictate what another limited company can do - but only as stipulated by the contract.
You say there was no exclusivity clause, however check the contract carefully about any non competition clauses - they are more common. However, if the other work your company undertook was not in competition with them - or for their competitors then you are probably in the clear.
Anyway, I'm still awaiting their response.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaftedcontractorNope, no agency, two small Ltd companies (me and them) only.
I'm getting the same opinion from everyone that they can't dictate what another Limited company can do (and they were the ones that stated it was to be a B2B contract basis rather than as a permie).
You say there was no exclusivity clause, however check the contract carefully about any non competition clauses - they are more common. However, if the other work your company undertook was not in competition with them - or for their competitors then you are probably in the clear.
I don't know if the PCG legal helpline will write a letter on your behalf (although I suspect not). If you have not got resolution quickly then get a solcitor to do it for you. Unfortunately this is just one of the costs you generally need to take on the chin, but an imaginitive solicitor might be able to find ways of counter claiming.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MordacIs there an agency involved? Either way, no contract (except perhaps a permie contract) can dictate who else you work for. Sounds like an HR monkey needs a little education in business contract law, perhaps?
I'm getting the same opinion from everyone that they can't dictate what another Limited company can do (and they were the ones that stated it was to be a B2B contract basis rather than as a permie).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by SockpuppetIf I were you'd I'll tell them how much interest you are going to start charging them on what they owe you and get your solicitor to write a strongly worded letter stating the fact.
Hell, better still send them a link to thread and we can laugh at them...if that doesnt make a point they deserve to get shafted in the courts.
If I don't get a decent resolution then I may well invite them to post on here.
Leave a comment:
-
Is there an agency involved? Either way, no contract (except perhaps a permie contract) can dictate who else you work for. Sounds like an HR monkey needs a little education in business contract law, perhaps?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaftedcontractorYes, the additional work was for other clients. They were under some impression that my Limited Company was to work exclusively for them, even though it says nothing about it in my contract.
Feck 'em - time to take it to the mattressess (sp?)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by shaftedcontractorThanks for the hint, I'll give that a go.
Yes, the additional work was for other clients. They were under some impression that my Limited Company was to work exclusively for them, even though it says nothing about it in my contract.
If I were you'd I'll tell them how much interest you are going to start charging them on what they owe you and get your solicitor to write a strongly worded letter stating the fact.
Hell, better still send them a link to thread and we can laugh at them...if that doesnt make a point they deserve to get shafted in the courts.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by PondlifeHave you tried the PCG legal helpline? You're a paid up member so might as well use the benefits.
Originally posted by PondlifeAlso it wasn't clear (or I skimmed over it) but the additional work was for other clients and not the one your agency is contracted to. i.e. you weren't doing a bit of extra work for them and invoicing separately?
Leave a comment:
-
Have you tried the PCG legal helpline? You're a paid up member so might as well use the benefits.
Also it wasn't clear (or I skimmed over it) but the additional work was for other clients and not the one your agency is contracted to. i.e. you weren't doing a bit of extra work for them and invoicing separately?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Ardesco"EXACTLY!!!, now gimmie my money you fkuctards!!"
Leave a comment:
-
LOL!!!
Thanks Ardesco, that really cheered me up on a day like today.
Anyway, I'll see what they come back with and post back here.
Leave a comment:
-
Well if they really thought that they should have put a specific clause into your contract stating that and increased your rate accordingly to compensate for your loss of income from other ventures.
Ask them if they would agree to only sell thier products/services to 1 customer only. When you get a stunned silence, or a "don't be stupid" you can reply with "EXACTLY!!!, now gimmie my money you fkuctards!!"
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks Ardesco.
To be honest, I've spoken to a solicitor and she says the same thing. Unfortunately it looks like this month's wages are going to be delayed until the court action... :-(
It's a shame it's all turned like this. The contact I have at the company feels that I shouldn't have been working outside of their contract, so is in agreement with the company owners.
Anyway, there's still another hour or two of the day left so hopefully they'll come back with something more sensible.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Leave a comment: