• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Draft legislation regarding MVLs"

Collapse

  • TheCyclingProgrammer
    replied
    Interesting. On one hand, its good that this is now being clarified rather than having to rely on the somewhat ambiguous rules in the Transactions in Securities legislation. No more guessing games.

    The only thing that seems unusual to me is that it appears to restrict the individual from working in the same trade at all (e.g. self-employed) rather than just through a new Ltd. Or is it just me reading it that way?

    That aside I don't think its unreasonable to restrict this - it targets those who like to routinely close their company and extract the profits as capital only to carry on again as before. OTOH it brings some clarity to somebody who is legitimately closing their company but who may return to contracting again in the future (after more than 2 years).

    If you legitimately close down the company for reasons where the main purpose is NOT to gain a tax advantage, but then find yourself returning to contracting again within 2 years...then what? Where does the burden of proof lie?
    Last edited by TheCyclingProgrammer; 9 December 2015, 14:27.

    Leave a comment:


  • jamesearljones
    replied
    You should theoretically be able to work under an umbrella company for 2 years I would have thought.

    Leave a comment:


  • chopper
    started a topic Draft legislation regarding MVLs

    Draft legislation regarding MVLs

    This has been published, which means if you wind up your limited company and restart in the same line of business within two years, then you cannot take advantage of drawing cash from the business as capital when winding it up.

    Corporation Tax, Income Tax and Capital Gains Tax: company distributions

    Basically:

    Legislation will be introduced in Finance Bill 2016 to amend ITTOIA and implement a new TAAR. The TAAR will treat a distribution from a winding-up as if it were an income distribution for the purpose of section 1000 CTA 2010 where certain conditions are met.

    These conditions are:

    * an individual (S) who is a shareholder in a close company (C) receives from C a distribution in respect of shares in a winding-up
    * within a period of two years after the distribution, S continues to be involved in a similar trade or activity
    * the circumstances surrounding the winding-up have the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of obtaining a tax advantage
    Draft clause : https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...use_16_-_1.pdf

Working...
X