• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Claiming expenses for a big fat luncheon?"

Collapse

  • oraclesmith
    replied
    No. It make no difference except....... if there is a non-zero balance on the Directors Loan Account at the end of the tax year. If this happens then either the Director has obtained a benefit (a loan) or the company has incurred a liability to a Director. Either way, there are tax implications.

    PS. One of the slight problems with paying your own expenses and reclaiming them is that it might be possible for the HMRC to extend an investigation into the Director's personal bank or credit card account because that is where the transactions originated.
    Last edited by oraclesmith; 21 September 2006, 23:18.

    Leave a comment:


  • minstrel
    replied
    Originally posted by ASB
    If you pay it yourself and claim it then *I think* it simply become a taxable bik - even though it is excluded from the CT calculation. Not very tax efficient.
    Originally posted by malvolio
    Precisely, that's why I use a company debit card. Everything that most people out there treat as reclaimable expenses - food, travel (not petrol!), hotels, spare parts, new laptops, whatever are paid directly by MyCo. I raise about two expense forms a year, usually when I've manged to leave the card behind!
    Is that really true? Does it really make a difference whether the company pays for it or a director pays and then claims it back as a legitimate business expense incurred on behalf of the company?

    Surely any benefit-in-kind tax relates to its value and whether it is a benefit or a legitimate company expense not who physically paid for it?

    "What, that all-inclusive two week trip to the Caribbean my company gave me as a bonus for all my hard work? Of course that's not a BIK Hector. Look - I've even got the company debit card receipt to prove it!"

    I agree paying expenses direct from the company account rather than via reclaimable expense is a cleaner way of doing things and would attract less attention as it wouldn't be on P11D etc, but when it comes to whether BIK tax is due does it matter which way it is done?

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Precisely, that's why I use a company debit card. Everything that most people out there treat as reclaimable expenses - food, travel (not petrol!), hotels, spare parts, new laptops, whatever are paid directly by MyCo. I raise about two expense forms a year, usually when I've manged to leave the card behind!

    Leave a comment:


  • ASB
    replied
    Most effecient way (assuming not overseas) is to pay directly with company cheque or similar. It is then simply disallowed from the CT calculation and is therefore only effectively taxed at 19%.

    If you pay it yourself and claim it then *I think* it simply become a taxable bik - even though it is excluded from the CT calculation. Not very tax efficient.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    OK fair enough - but then I don't do the CT calculations, that's what I pay them for!

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    OracleSmith is right, you can't offset against corporation tax but your company CAN pay it.

    This is the information from my accountant, who is also Malvolio's accountant...

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Nope. Asked my accountant about it a while back, since I used to run team meetings over lunch. Perfectly acceptable business expense, since they were my team, but not allowed to be offset as VAT since it is entertainment, not a provision of a service, hence no added value, hence no VAT

    However, buy a meal for yourself and you can have the VAT back, since that is a business expense.

    Leave a comment:


  • oraclesmith
    replied
    Really ? Isn't this business entertainment and not allowable as an expense against profits ? Your company can pay it, but it will have to pay corp tax on it. In my opinion.

    Leave a comment:


  • malvolio
    replied
    Yes of course, but don't claim the VAT back (if you're on the flat rate scheme, that doesn't matter, of course).

    Leave a comment:


  • oxtailsoup
    started a topic Claiming expenses for a big fat luncheon?

    Claiming expenses for a big fat luncheon?

    My contract is up for renewal and I'm planning on taking my project manager and his boss out for a fancy luncheon next week to oil the wheels of commerce etc.

    Can I claim for this expense through my limited company?

Working...
X