• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "No To Retro Tax - Ongoing battle against S58 FA2008"

Collapse

  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by d000hg View Post
    I'd not checked in this thread for ages... it all seems to have gone quiet, did you have to pay up in the end or is it STILL going on?
    No-one seems to have a clue what is going on. Its a total mystery.

    Though admin knows. Admin knows everything.

    Leave a comment:


  • d000hg
    replied
    I'd not checked in this thread for ages... it all seems to have gone quiet, did you have to pay up in the end or is it STILL going on?

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Was of time and effort. The government do everything HMRC tell them to do.

    Leave a comment:


  • RajaStyle
    replied
    Ongoing Petition

    https://you.38degrees.org.uk/petitio...-retrospective

    Leave a comment:


  • DonkeyRhubarb
    replied
    I've started a new thread.

    http://forums.contractoruk.com/accou...-bulletin.html

    Leave a comment:


  • DotasScandal
    replied
    Not good!
    Let's hope it still happens.

    Leave a comment:


  • Loan Ranger
    replied
    PS. according to my Accountants, late appeals are very rarely accepted, unless there are exceptional circumstances.

    So it looks like we may be shafted.
    Last edited by Loan Ranger; 22 July 2016, 12:45.

    Leave a comment:


  • Loan Ranger
    replied
    Huitson appeal

    According to the Upper Tax Tribunal, Montpelier's appeal was quote "seriously late".

    As a result, the entire appeal has been put in jeopardy. A Judge will decide whether it will be allowed.

    Montpelier's appeal was so late, in fact, that HMRC had already started gearing up to issue Follower Notices to everyone.

    Let's hope the appeal is allowed or the dreaded Follower Notices will be winging our way.

    Leave a comment:


  • DonkeyRhubarb
    replied
    Originally posted by Laxmi View Post
    I don't understand, seems they have offered no information?
    Yep, looks like they rejected the requests, which is often the case.

    HINT: there is some information in the requests themselves which people, who've had discoveries, might find useful.

    Some people who've taken the initiative and challenged discovery enquiries have already had those years closed off (with no further tax to pay).
    Last edited by DonkeyRhubarb; 10 July 2016, 07:19.

    Leave a comment:


  • Laxmi
    replied
    Originally posted by DonkeyRhubarb View Post
    If you had enquires opened late under discovery, or received discovery assessments (also referred to as notice of assessment), the following might be of interest:

    http://forums.contractoruk.com/hmrc-...discovery.html
    I don't understand, seems they have offered no information?

    Leave a comment:


  • DonkeyRhubarb
    replied
    Discovery

    If you had enquires opened late under discovery, or received discovery assessments (also referred to as notice of assessment), the following might be of interest:

    http://forums.contractoruk.com/hmrc-...discovery.html

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by ns1 View Post
    http://www.taxjournal.com/tj/article...-hmrc-22092015

    Any idea what the odds are of them winning?
    Yes.

    The odds of them winning are slim. But so was Leicester winning the premier league!

    WG has shown himself to be at his best when in a corner! Go WG! Sock it to HMRC.....

    Leave a comment:


  • ns1
    replied
    Is this what Montpelier are appealing against?

    http://www.taxjournal.com/tj/article...-hmrc-22092015

    Any idea what the odds are of them winning?

    Leave a comment:


  • Laxmi
    replied
    Originally posted by SantaClaus View Post
    Hi all

    CCW have provided us with a letter for all NTRT members, if you wish to make a complaint/claim for personal costs incurred by an APN.

    The letter can be found here on the NTRT website:

    Link to members area page

    Please ensure you are logged onto the NTRT website with your NTRT username and password in order to avoid a "membership closed" error screen.


    You can also access the letter using the menus: Members Area -> APN Letters Of Complaint

    Thanks

    Santa
    Should probably include the fact that CDTs cannot be reinstated. After all HMRC time machine has limited one way functionality - to extort money.

    Leave a comment:


  • SantaClaus
    replied
    Complaint and claim for costs against wrongly issued APN

    Hi all

    CCW have provided us with a letter for all NTRT members, if you wish to make a complaint/claim for personal costs incurred by an APN.

    The letter can be found here on the NTRT website:

    Link to members area page

    Please ensure you are logged onto the NTRT website with your NTRT username and password in order to avoid a "membership closed" error screen.


    You can also access the letter using the menus: Members Area -> APN Letters Of Complaint

    Thanks

    Santa
    Last edited by SantaClaus; 9 May 2016, 13:45.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X