Originally posted by stunews
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "help with financial services client & VAT registration"
Collapse
-
There is an agency involved, so does it depend on their VAT status, rather than the end client?Originally posted by Alan @ BroomeAffinity View PostIf you re VAT registered and providing standard rate services (worth checking) then you need to charge VAT. I'm assuming there's no agency involved in which case you'd be charging them VAT, not the client.
But, if the contract doesn't specify whether the rate is ex or inc then there is a possibility of an argument between you and the client. Submit the first invoice adding VAT and see what happens. If they pay it, you're in the clear. If they don't, stating that the rate was to be inclusive, then suck it up for the first invoice and chalk it down to experience. Then, de-register for VAT immediately so you don't need to worry about it again.
Thanks for the advice on the de-registering bit if it is the worst case..
Leave a comment:
-
So the lesson is you should always ascertain if the rate is inclusive of VAT before you sign a contract!Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostYou agree £100 a day plus VAT. You invoice £100 a day, plus £20 a day VAT, so £600 a week. You then hand over £87 a week to the VAT man (14.5% of the £600 amount). Company earns £513 a week.
I suspect that the client is expecting to see £100 a day, in which case you would actually be invoicing £83.33 a day plus 20% VAT. You then hand over £72.50 a week (14.5% of £500) to the VAT man. Company earns £427.50 a week.
Leave a comment:
-
You agree £100 a day plus VAT. You invoice £100 a day, plus £20 a day VAT, so £600 a week. You then hand over £87 a week to the VAT man (14.5% of the £600 amount). Company earns £513 a week.Originally posted by stunews View PostThanks FaQQer. So let's see if I understand your point correctly.
Say I agreed a theoretical day rate of £100. Are you saying that the invoice will always be like so, whether they are VAT registered or not?
5 x 1 day @ £100 = £500
VAT at 14.5% = £72.50
Total £572.50
??
I suspect that the client is expecting to see £100 a day, in which case you would actually be invoicing £83.33 a day plus 20% VAT. You then hand over £72.50 a week (14.5% of £500) to the VAT man. Company earns £427.50 a week.
Leave a comment:
-
If you re VAT registered and providing standard rate services (worth checking) then you need to charge VAT. I'm assuming there's no agency involved in which case you'd be charging them VAT, not the client.
But, if the contract doesn't specify whether the rate is ex or inc then there is a possibility of an argument between you and the client. Submit the first invoice adding VAT and see what happens. If they pay it, you're in the clear. If they don't, stating that the rate was to be inclusive, then suck it up for the first invoice and chalk it down to experience. Then, de-register for VAT immediately so you don't need to worry about it again.
Leave a comment:
-
When my mum goes to Tesco to do her weekly shop, she has to pay VAT on what she buys, despite the fact that my mum isn't VAT registered.
VAT is chargeable at 20%.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks FaQQer. So let's see if I understand your point correctly.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostThe fact that the client isn't VAT registered is irrelevant - if you are VAT registered, then you invoice must include VAT.
If they quoted a gross price and you meant a net price, then you need to check the contract and see what it says.
Say I agreed a theoretical day rate of £100. Are you saying that the invoice will always be like so, whether they are VAT registered or not?
5 x 1 day @ £100 = £500
VAT at 14.5% = £72.50
Total £572.50
??
Leave a comment:
-
The contract just say £XX0 per day.
Nothing specific about VAT, so I just assumed the VAT would be added on top.
My accountant is being rather unhelpful. What they're saying isn't clear, and they've got me worried:
Time for a call I think..If they are VAT registered, you should be charging them VAT on top of your day rate. If you're not, the VAT that you should be charging will need to paid out of your own pocket.
Leave a comment:
-
If the client isn't going to pay the VAT inclusive rate, you aren't going to make anything by being on FRS, though.Originally posted by northernladuk View PostWhy don't you actually speak to your accountant and get his advice? I have a funny feeling he will mention something about FRS and the fact you can actually make a couple of percent on it.
Leave a comment:
-
Why don't you actually speak to your accountant and get his advice? I have a funny feeling he will mention something about FRS and the fact you can actually make a couple of percent on it.
Leave a comment:
-
The fact that the client isn't VAT registered is irrelevant - if you are VAT registered, then you invoice must include VAT.
If they quoted a gross price and you meant a net price, then you need to check the contract and see what it says.
Leave a comment:
-
help with financial services client & VAT registration
I've just started contracting again recently.
I had the choice of being VAT registered or not because I don't see myself earning over the threshold this year.
I understood being registered was good thing because I can charge VAT and be on the flat rate scheme, and retain ~5% (or something like that) in the company. So I asked the accountant to register for VAT, this was sent earlier this week.
The problem is, I just forwarded some payment documentation to the accountant, and they said it doesn't look like the client is VAT registered. As such, if I'm VAT registered, I've got to pay the VAT myself, which is a considerable chunk of cash that's going the wrong way!
1. Can I just ask someone here at the client's workplace if they are VAT registered? Or is that a no-no?
2. Do you think, at this stage, I should ask the accountant to cancel the VAT registration, if possible.
3. If I plan on working with financial services companies, am I right in thinking it's a bad thing to be VAT registered?
Any advice/help on this would be appreciated..
Thanks
StuTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Rachel Reeves overlooks contractors in ‘thin’ Spring Statement 2026 Today 07:15
- Spring Statement 2026: chancellor’s full speech Yesterday 21:03
- Unlike today’s ‘boring’ Spring Statement 2026, Make Work Pay is transformative for contractors Yesterday 07:45
- Here’s Joint & Several Liability’s big misconception, and 5 key risks Mar 2 06:59
- How to run a limited company — efficiently: smarter profit strategies Feb 27 07:13
- IR35 & Mutuality of Obligation in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 26 07:32
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Feb 25 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 24 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13

Leave a comment: