• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Top council earner avoids income tax"

Collapse

  • Boo
    replied
    Originally posted by Kess View Post
    When I see lurid media stories like that I have to wonder how many of the newspaper's reporters and columnists have similar arrangements...
    In fairness it is far easier for reporters to have genuine contracts of self-employment / consultancy than it is for the average BOS IT bloke/ess.

    Boo

    Leave a comment:


  • Kess
    replied
    Originally posted by pacontracting View Post
    What the article failed to mention when it stated that he 'only' paid 21% corporation tax was that he would also pay 25% income tax on any higher rate income he drew as a dividend.
    True, but the media seldom allows facts to get in the way of a juicy story.

    Leave a comment:


  • Zero Liability
    replied
    Individuals utilising PSCs in the public sector have been and are being scrutinised by Hector constantly. So the clamping down is already on-going.

    Leave a comment:


  • pacontracting
    replied
    Originally posted by Kess View Post
    When I see lurid media stories like that I have to wonder how many of the newspaper's reporters and columnists have similar arrangements...
    What the article failed to mention when it stated that he 'only' paid 21% corporation tax was that he would also pay 25% income tax on any higher rate income he drew as a dividend.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kess
    replied
    When I see lurid media stories like that I have to wonder how many of the newspaper's reporters and columnists have similar arrangements...

    Leave a comment:


  • SteelyDan
    replied
    http://forums.contractoruk.com/busin...ntracting.html

    KUATB

    Leave a comment:


  • retrodeath
    started a topic Top council earner avoids income tax

    Top council earner avoids income tax

    Times pg 14.

    "Channels his income through his company in a scheme that reduces tax bills"

    "His earnings go to company owned by him & wife. As result he avoids income tax at 45%, paying as little as 21% in dividends."

    Government wants to clamp down...

    Sounds pretty much what a vanilla contractor does.

    Article has government worker slant but can only be a matter of time before service companies targeted.

    And if it is decided that you've been running a company as a tax vehicle then don't be surprised if you find you are in dispute for a fat wad of pseudo tax.

    Hector is coming.
    Last edited by retrodeath; 24 August 2014, 16:40.

Working...
X