Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Top council earner avoids income tax"
What the article failed to mention when it stated that he 'only' paid 21% corporation tax was that he would also pay 25% income tax on any higher rate income he drew as a dividend.
True, but the media seldom allows facts to get in the way of a juicy story.
When I see lurid media stories like that I have to wonder how many of the newspaper's reporters and columnists have similar arrangements...
What the article failed to mention when it stated that he 'only' paid 21% corporation tax was that he would also pay 25% income tax on any higher rate income he drew as a dividend.
"Channels his income through his company in a scheme that reduces tax bills"
"His earnings go to company owned by him & wife. As result he avoids income tax at 45%, paying as little as 21% in dividends."
Government wants to clamp down...
Sounds pretty much what a vanilla contractor does.
Article has government worker slant but can only be a matter of time before service companies targeted.
And if it is decided that you've been running a company as a tax vehicle then don't be surprised if you find you are in dispute for a fat wad of pseudo tax.
Leave a comment: