• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Six Nations The Turd (ahem The Third)

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    I support Scotland

    If the Lamont's don't die in the first game & we can stop Dan Parks hoofing it off the field whenever he touches it, I reckon we're in with a chance!

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Swiss Tony View Post
      Are you Scotland in disguise?


      We'll we won the Grand Slam last year so maybe just maybe we can do it again!!

      As for the CUK league... must be my turn.. the Bear just gets lucky
      Bazza gets caught
      Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."

      CUK University Challenge Champions 2010

      Comment


        #23
        Well you beat the aussies in the autumn internationals (albeit a missed kick, though you were still close on scores which none of the other home nations can say.)
        "Wait, I still function!"

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
          so maybe just maybe we can do it again
          Thats the winning spirit
          "Wait, I still function!"

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by Swiss Tony View Post
            How long do we think it will take for an Italian team to rise that can competitively compete with the other members (excluding the Scot’s of course)
            As long as it takes for them to teach their backs to catch and throw a ball.
            And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
              As long as it takes for them to teach their backs to catch and throw a ball.
              That LONG!!
              "Wait, I still function!"

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by Swiss Tony View Post
                That LONG!!
                I know how to sort them out. The old fashioned way of dealing with crap backs. Every time the forwards work their asses off to win the ball and some tosspot in the backs goes and drops it, messrs Parisse, Castrogiovanni and lo Cicero should just go and stand on his toes and put tiger balm in his jockstrap. That’ll teach them.

                Anyway, can anyone tell me what ‘backs’ are for?
                And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                  I know how to sort them out. The old fashioned way of dealing with crap backs. Every time the forwards work their asses off to win the ball and some tosspot in the backs goes and drops it, messrs Parisse, Castrogiovanni and lo Cicero should just go and stand on his toes and put tiger balm in his jockstrap. That’ll teach them.

                  Anyway, can anyone tell me what ‘backs’ are for?
                  to bug the tulip out of the forwards

                  Bazza gets caught
                  Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."

                  CUK University Challenge Champions 2010

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
                    to bug the tulip out of the forwards

                    And kick the ball into the bloody car park when it's freezing cold. They’ve got a bloody nerve. Bunch of florists with their hair gel and big double-figured numbers on their backs. I think rugby could be made more entertaining by making the pitch half as wide and playing 8 a side, minimum weight 16 stone.
                    And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
                      And kick the ball into the bloody car park when it's freezing cold. They’ve got a bloody nerve. Bunch of florists with their hair gel and big double-figured numbers on their backs. I think rugby could be made more entertaining by making the pitch half as wide and playing 8 a side, minimum weight 16 stone.
                      Little less eyecandy then though... so lets not campaign for that eh?
                      Bazza gets caught
                      Socrates - "The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing."

                      CUK University Challenge Champions 2010

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X