Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
I have worked with two programmers who actually believed that.
One was an ex-operator who could not grasp that there might be a human who cares about the output.
The other was an experienced programmer with a banking background. He had never had any exposure to the concept of testing - he did not know such a task existed. He thought that a clean compilation = working programming good enough to send out.
I've just remembered a third - a C programmer who said 'informationals and warnings don't count'. This was the bod that added 'one' or 'two' or 'four' or whatever to a bit flag to turn a bit on and added it again to turn it off. I spent an afternoon trying to explain what XOR was for but he was having none of it. The bugs he caused used to drive me mental. (E.g. every 16th press of RETURN would alternately turn the cursor off or on.)
Drivelling in TPD is not a mental health issue. We're just community blogging, that's all.
I am trying to decide whether I should go to sleep, or stay up and watch the Australia v New Zealand cricket that is going to start in about an hour and a half.
I am trying to decide whether I should go to sleep, or stay up and watch the Australia v New Zealand cricket that is going to start in about an hour and a half.
Or help TPD get to 50,000 posts
Drivelling in TPD is not a mental health issue. We're just community blogging, that's all.
Comment