Originally posted by zeitghost
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
test please delete
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse
-
Huh? Got something else to go to?And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014 -
Comment
-
Big warchest and can't be arsed any more?Originally posted by zeitghost View PostNope.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Probly about 3 years worth at my usual rate of expenditure.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostBig warchest and can't be arsed any more?
<ZG in "Don't push me, mother****er" mode>

Probly never work again, but hey! who gives a tulip?
Comment
-
Project timeline
March - I pointed out that best practice should bounce one DB component at least once a week. Support team didn't even acknowledge this.
Yesterday - I mentioned it again. Support team manager tells the project team "I told the DBA, and he is doing this now"
Today - checked component status. Started date February 24, 2012.
And they wonder why things don't work properly.Comment
-
Are the esteemed customers getting you down?Originally posted by zeitghost View PostProbly about 3 years worth at my usual rate of expenditure.
<ZG in "Don't push me, mother****er" mode>

Probly never work again, but hey! who gives a tulip?
Don't assume people are any brighter elsewhere.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Nope.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostAre the esteemed customers getting you down?
Don't assume people are any brighter elsewhere.
It's management.
Or what passes for management in this tuliphole.
But, stone me, they can't be any denser than our esteemed customers.Comment
-
I looked at those today but they're not suitable if you're wearing soft contact lenses. Which I amOriginally posted by zeitghost View PostThe cromoglycate eyedrops are good.
Some years it's all I require.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by zeitghost View Post
Morning all.

May be putting my notice in today.
Surprise! Mother****ers!*
*The mother****ers being them, rather than you lot.
Just to keep things clear, like. 
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Today 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Yesterday 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05

Comment