Originally posted by TheFaQQer
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
test please delete
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
Collapse
-
-
PALI.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostIt really shouldn't take 10 minutes to return a value, really.
Comment
-
It's still counting.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostIt really shouldn't take 10 minutes to return a value, really.
Either there are a lot of rows or the system is fcuked. Or both.Comment
-
-
-
My money is on both.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostIt's still counting.
Either there are a lot of rows or the system is fcuked. Or both.+50 Xeno Geek Points
Come back Toolpusher, scotspine, Voodooflux.Pogle
As for the rest of you - DILLIGAF
Purveyor of fine quality smut since 2005
CUK Olympic University Challenge Champions 2010/2012
Comment
-
Comment
-
Here's a question for the client to consider.
You have an existing process which is continually fcuking up the production kit. You have a shiny new version of the process, which your expensive external consultant wrote for you, but hasn't passed testing because you don't know what it is meant to do, or have anyone competent to test it. You have left this completed piece of work for six months since it was completed before testing it.
Would you not be kicking the testing team to get the ****ing thing passed and into production??!?!?!?Comment
-
There should be no more than 10000 records in the table, but the duff code has generated several million more.
And nobody wrote anything to purge the data once it was no longer required.
It's currently taking up 44GB of disk space
Comment
-
The time has come, the walrus said, to speak of many things.
But mostly about buggering off down the hill in the rain on my way home.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Today 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Yesterday 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36
- The JSL legislation we’ll surely get just dropped. Here’s 4 ‘indelibles’ Dec 10 07:26

Comment