• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

My Risk head hurts. Do my sums for me.

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    My Risk head hurts. Do my sums for me.

    In the board game, Risk, the attacker may attack with up to 3 armies and the defender defend with up to 2. I am looking at the survival numbers of two neighbouring countries with huge armies.

    (Rules: the attacker rolls 3 D6 dice and the defender rolls 2 D6 dice. The highest attacking dice is put against the highest defending dice and if the attacker is higher, the defender loses an army otherwise the attacker loses an army. This is repeated for the second highest dice. The third attacker's dice is not used.)

    I had a program with a random number generator carrying out attacks millions of times but only concluded that the attacker loses about 85.3% of the troops the defender loses. Although this confirms the odds are in the attacker's favour (which is what I wanted to know), it left other questions.

    There are 7,776 permutations of the possible dice rolls (6^5). In playing each of these once, that results in 7,161 dead attacking troops and 8,392 dead defending troops.

    Is there a formula for determining these numbers?

    7,161 is 3x7x11x13. What a funny number.

    8,392 is 2x2x2x1049. Another funny number.

    Can anyone enlighten me with relevant formulae?

    For example, what if 4 attackers played 3 defenders? Or D10 dice were used? There must be a way of calculating the outcome without resorting to brute force.

    (I must have been off sick when we did permutations and combinations, as I'm out of my depth. I certainly don't feel like a Brolly Bonce, that's for sure.)

    #2
    I know how to play the game (Hence my name), but I'm not a whizz with maths, sorry.
    Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

    C.S. Lewis

    Comment


      #3
      Get


























      A























      Life
      What happens in General, stays in General.
      You know what they say about assumptions!

      Comment


        #4
        BollyBronce, your risk headache is over



        risk odds


        4 vs 3

        38 % chance attacker is defeated
        62 % chance defender is defeated


        (\__/)
        (>'.'<)
        ("")("") Born to Drink. Forced to Work

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
          BollyBronce, your risk headache is over
          I was after the underlying formulae.

          I shall read Understanding Probability by Henk Tijms since it was recommended on here and see if that can enlighten me. Especially since I was given a copy today.

          Comment

          Working...
          X