• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Walking to the shops ‘damages planet more than going by car’

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    What about good old nuclear? It's works well with submarines and feasibly could work well with planes (nuclear hydrogen jets). This technology could be easily transplanted into boats and freighters and bearing in mind that most nuclear plants in commission now days were built in the 50's and still haven't made the workers grow new body parts, nuclear really doesn't deserve most of the bad press it gets.

    Why is it so hard to replace a lot of plastics with wood? Why is it hard to replace clothing using plastics with clothing using cotton?

    Brazil seems to run it's cars pretty successfully on ethanol, so why is this not feasible for anybody else (The whole reason that happened was because they didn't want to have thier automotive industry reliant on oil coming from america)?
    We currently use a lot of oil because it is an easy resource to purchase and can be used to create many different things, however we currently have alternatives that we can use if we so desire. The only difference is that we will have to use them if oil runs out.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by dang65
      This is interesting by the way, just in case you weren't panicking already.
      Thanks - I needed cheering up.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Ardesco
        What about good old nuclear? It's works well with submarines and feasibly could work well with planes (nuclear hydrogen jets). This technology could be easily transplanted into boats and freighters and bearing in mind that most nuclear plants in commission now days were built in the 50's and still haven't made the workers grow new body parts, nuclear really doesn't deserve most of the bad press it gets.

        Why is it so hard to replace a lot of plastics with wood? Why is it hard to replace clothing using plastics with clothing using cotton?

        Brazil seems to run it's cars pretty successfully on ethanol, so why is this not feasible for anybody else (The whole reason that happened was because they didn't want to have thier automotive industry reliant on oil coming from america)?
        We currently use a lot of oil because it is an easy resource to purchase and can be used to create many different things, however we currently have alternatives that we can use if we so desire. The only difference is that we will have to use them if oil runs out.
        Nuclear: Too pricey. The safety costs are astronomical. Oh, and it takes a lot of energy to actually get the stuff ready to use. Which means oil.

        Ethanol:
        Talking out of my botty here, but I imagine to satisfy the enormous demand for energy, there'd need to be more crops than can be grown.

        Alternatives: No. To manaufacture viable alternatives, the creation of the necessary infrastructure would use up enormous quantities of... oil.

        Comment

        Working...
        X