Originally posted by Darren at DynamoAccounts
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The Decision Tool :)
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
errr
so unless Im getting this wrong, it appears as though if you have a good substitution clause then youre golden?Comment
-
Yep.Originally posted by fxc View Postso unless Im getting this wrong, it appears as though if you have a good substitution clause then youre golden?Comment
-
-
Works fine in Chrome for meOriginally posted by anonymouse View PostOnly IE
And in Firefox as well.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. But Gandhi never had to deal with HMRC
Comment
-
worked fine for me on Chrome.Originally posted by anonymouse View PostOnly IEThis default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernamesComment
-
HMRC
Seems to work in Explorer but not Chrome, odd!Originally posted by teapot418 View PostWorks for me?Comment
-
What version?Originally posted by Darren at DynamoAccounts View PostSeems to work in Explorer but not Chrome, odd!Comment
-
but you need to read the question. Would your client actually take your mate instead without an interview. That is never going to happen and it was always disingenuous to say it would. Even a big firm will have to ask to move their minions out...Originally posted by fxc View Postso unless Im getting this wrong, it appears as though if you have a good substitution clause then youre golden?Comment
-
The only instance in which they would is if the other contractor is already known to the clientOriginally posted by bobspud View Postbut you need to read the question. Would your client actually take your mate instead without an interview. That is never going to happen and it was always disingenuous to say it would. Even a big firm will have to ask to move their minions out...
.
The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Post Office hit with ‘crazy’ £104million HMRC bill for IR35 failings Today 07:03
- IR35 & Right of Substitution in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Yesterday 06:59
- Why Rupert Lowe MP’s Restore Britain has it wrong on IR35 Feb 23 07:21
- IR35 & Control in 2026/27: Explainer for Contractors Feb 20 07:13
- How key for IR35 will Control be in 2026/27? Feb 20 07:13
- Changes to non-compete clauses in employment contracts require ministers to tread carefully Feb 19 07:59
- What does the non-compete clause consultation mean for contractors? Feb 19 07:59
- To escalate or wait? With late payment, even month two is too late Feb 18 07:26
- Signs of IT contractor jobs uplift softened in January 2026 Feb 17 07:37
- ‘Make Work Pay…’ heralds a new era for umbrella company compliance Feb 16 08:23


Comment