Originally posted by Darren at DynamoAccounts
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The Decision Tool :)
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
errr
so unless Im getting this wrong, it appears as though if you have a good substitution clause then youre golden?Comment
-
Yep.Originally posted by fxc View Postso unless Im getting this wrong, it appears as though if you have a good substitution clause then youre golden?Comment
-
-
Works fine in Chrome for meOriginally posted by anonymouse View PostOnly IE
And in Firefox as well.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. But Gandhi never had to deal with HMRC
Comment
-
worked fine for me on Chrome.Originally posted by anonymouse View PostOnly IEThis default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernamesComment
-
HMRC
Seems to work in Explorer but not Chrome, odd!Originally posted by teapot418 View PostWorks for me?Comment
-
What version?Originally posted by Darren at DynamoAccounts View PostSeems to work in Explorer but not Chrome, odd!Comment
-
but you need to read the question. Would your client actually take your mate instead without an interview. That is never going to happen and it was always disingenuous to say it would. Even a big firm will have to ask to move their minions out...Originally posted by fxc View Postso unless Im getting this wrong, it appears as though if you have a good substitution clause then youre golden?Comment
-
The only instance in which they would is if the other contractor is already known to the clientOriginally posted by bobspud View Postbut you need to read the question. Would your client actually take your mate instead without an interview. That is never going to happen and it was always disingenuous to say it would. Even a big firm will have to ask to move their minions out...
.
The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36


Comment