Originally posted by Darren at DynamoAccounts
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The Decision Tool :)
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
errr
so unless Im getting this wrong, it appears as though if you have a good substitution clause then youre golden?Comment
-
Yep.Originally posted by fxc View Postso unless Im getting this wrong, it appears as though if you have a good substitution clause then youre golden?Comment
-
-
Works fine in Chrome for meOriginally posted by anonymouse View PostOnly IE
And in Firefox as well.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. But Gandhi never had to deal with HMRC
Comment
-
worked fine for me on Chrome.Originally posted by anonymouse View PostOnly IEThis default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernamesComment
-
HMRC
Seems to work in Explorer but not Chrome, odd!Originally posted by teapot418 View PostWorks for me?Comment
-
What version?Originally posted by Darren at DynamoAccounts View PostSeems to work in Explorer but not Chrome, odd!Comment
-
but you need to read the question. Would your client actually take your mate instead without an interview. That is never going to happen and it was always disingenuous to say it would. Even a big firm will have to ask to move their minions out...Originally posted by fxc View Postso unless Im getting this wrong, it appears as though if you have a good substitution clause then youre golden?Comment
-
The only instance in which they would is if the other contractor is already known to the clientOriginally posted by bobspud View Postbut you need to read the question. Would your client actually take your mate instead without an interview. That is never going to happen and it was always disingenuous to say it would. Even a big firm will have to ask to move their minions out...
.
The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Today 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Yesterday 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02
- How to run a contractor limited company — efficiently. Part one: software Jan 22 23:31
- Forget February as an MSC contractor seeking clarity, and maybe forget fairness altogether Jan 22 19:57
- What contractors should take from Honest Payroll Ltd’s failure Jan 21 07:05
- HMRC tax avoidance list ‘proves promoters’ nothing-to-lose mentality’ Jan 20 09:17
- Digital ID won’t be required for Right To Work, but more compulsion looms Jan 19 07:41


Comment