Originally posted by Darren at DynamoAccounts
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
The Decision Tool :)
Collapse
X
Collapse
-
-
errr
so unless Im getting this wrong, it appears as though if you have a good substitution clause then youre golden?Comment
-
Yep.Originally posted by fxc View Postso unless Im getting this wrong, it appears as though if you have a good substitution clause then youre golden?Comment
-
-
Works fine in Chrome for meOriginally posted by anonymouse View PostOnly IE
And in Firefox as well.
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. But Gandhi never had to deal with HMRC
Comment
-
worked fine for me on Chrome.Originally posted by anonymouse View PostOnly IEThis default font is sooooooooooooo boring and so are short usernamesComment
-
HMRC
Seems to work in Explorer but not Chrome, odd!Originally posted by teapot418 View PostWorks for me?Comment
-
What version?Originally posted by Darren at DynamoAccounts View PostSeems to work in Explorer but not Chrome, odd!Comment
-
but you need to read the question. Would your client actually take your mate instead without an interview. That is never going to happen and it was always disingenuous to say it would. Even a big firm will have to ask to move their minions out...Originally posted by fxc View Postso unless Im getting this wrong, it appears as though if you have a good substitution clause then youre golden?Comment
-
The only instance in which they would is if the other contractor is already known to the clientOriginally posted by bobspud View Postbut you need to read the question. Would your client actually take your mate instead without an interview. That is never going to happen and it was always disingenuous to say it would. Even a big firm will have to ask to move their minions out...
.
The Chunt of Chunts.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IT contractor demand lunged towards growth in April 2026 May 13 04:48
- What does PGMOL’s win over HMRC mean for contractors? May 12 07:25
- Contractors eyeing mortgages ‘unrealistic about BoE’s 3.75% hold decision’ May 11 07:50
- The fake job problem is getting worse. Are contractors a particularly easy target? May 8 07:49
- Government policy on freelancing is stopping the contractor model from doing its thing May 7 08:12
- Contractors, can the new HMRC loan charge settlement opportunity reduce your bill? May 6 07:51
- PGMOL’s ‘not finely balanced’ win over HMRC could be ‘persuasive’ in IR35 cases May 5 07:10
- Is Reporting Company Payments to Participators a concerning consultation for contractors? Apr 29 07:38
- Now it’s finally here, how is HMRC Joint & Several Liability risk being managed, and is payment control the holy grail? Apr 28 06:55
- How Managed Service Providers (MSPs) are hit by HMRC’s Joint & Several Liability Apr 27 06:08


Comment