I don't agree. Accountax took Boyle completely unprepared. Judge did not even trusted Boyle as witness. All points of defence against ToAA were even not discussed. Seemed like a completely un cooked effort. Accountax should have know the issues with scheme and should have prepared accordingly or told Boyle it is not possible. To me it looked accountax teamed with HMRC rather then Boyle.
Going to tribunal like Boyle is useless. Look at rangers cases. Council made all the difference.
For going to tribunal u need at least £300000 or £400000 if want a silk. You need 1000 or so members in a group and someone like Saleos or Rob organising it. Then proper solicitors filing all the application to tribunal. Individual applications will have to filed and agreement from tribunal will be required for hearing s lead case. Get a proper council.
It is a numbers game. 1000 people together will be able to all the way up the court system with £1000-£1500 from each. Representing yourself or with likes of accounts is shooting yrself in foot.
If the scheme was implemented properly and is defendable, £1000 looks to me a very small sum compared to sums involved here.
Going to tribunal like Boyle is useless. Look at rangers cases. Council made all the difference.
For going to tribunal u need at least £300000 or £400000 if want a silk. You need 1000 or so members in a group and someone like Saleos or Rob organising it. Then proper solicitors filing all the application to tribunal. Individual applications will have to filed and agreement from tribunal will be required for hearing s lead case. Get a proper council.
It is a numbers game. 1000 people together will be able to all the way up the court system with £1000-£1500 from each. Representing yourself or with likes of accounts is shooting yrself in foot.
If the scheme was implemented properly and is defendable, £1000 looks to me a very small sum compared to sums involved here.
Comment