• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Edge EBT thread

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Group website

    I've been advised that the s29ers (Edge) Help Group website has been re-branded and updated.

    Please take a look Norla Edge Former Employee Self Help Group EBT Employee Benefit Trust

    Comment


      Follower Notices and Philip Boyle decision

      I predict that HMRC will use the Philip Boyle decision to issue follower notices to users of non-DOTAS schemes such as Edge.

      There is a provision in the Finance Act 2014 for a 12 month limit for HMRC to issue a follower notice after a relevant final judicial ruling.

      However, hidden in Clause 210 of the Bill is a transitional provision which could allow HMRC to use that decision for three years from the date on which the Act is passed.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Michael J Perry FCA View Post
        I predict that HMRC will use the Philip Boyle decision to issue follower notices to users of non-DOTAS schemes such as Edge.

        There is a provision in the Finance Act 2014 for a 12 month limit for HMRC to issue a follower notice after a relevant final judicial ruling.

        However, hidden in Clause 210 of the Bill is a transitional provision which could allow HMRC to use that decision for three years from the date on which the Act is passed.
        Boyle was using a forex scheme wasn't he? Surely they can only target that particular mechanism with the follower notices
        Connect with me on LinkedIn

        Follow us on Twitter.

        ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

        Comment


          Originally posted by Michael J Perry FCA View Post
          I predict that HMRC will use the Philip Boyle decision to issue follower notices to users of non-DOTAS schemes such as Edge.

          There is a provision in the Finance Act 2014 for a 12 month limit for HMRC to issue a follower notice after a relevant final judicial ruling.

          However, hidden in Clause 210 of the Bill is a transitional provision which could allow HMRC to use that decision for three years from the date on which the Act is passed.
          How would they apply a follower notice to a non DOTAS scheme? Is there not a provision in the bill to require non DOTAS schemes to be evaluated by the GAAR first?
          How would they work out the amounts?

          Comment


            Originally posted by jbryce View Post
            How would they apply a follower notice to a non DOTAS scheme? Is there not a provision in the bill to require non DOTAS schemes to be evaluated by the GAAR first?
            How would they work out the amounts?
            If a scheme mechanism has been tested in court and failed then HMRC can sent payment notices to users of schemes which they feel operate in the same way
            Connect with me on LinkedIn

            Follow us on Twitter.

            ContractorUK Best Forum Advisor 2015

            Comment


              Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
              If a scheme mechanism has been tested in court and failed then HMRC can sent payment notices to users of schemes which they feel operate in the same way

              Believe Edge was a DOTAS Scheme and wasn't based on Forex - so not sure how it applies

              Comment


                Originally posted by Michael J Perry FCA View Post
                I predict that HMRC will use the Philip Boyle decision to issue follower notices to users of non-DOTAS schemes such as Edge.
                Edge did have a DOTAS number, at least it did in the 10/11 tax year.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by LisaContractorUmbrella View Post
                  If a scheme mechanism has been tested in court and failed then HMRC can sent payment notices to users of schemes which they feel operate in the same way
                  My sins were all DOTAS, so GAAR is a bit of a mystery to me, however I reckon that non DOTAS schemes have to be reviewed by the GAAR.

                  The HMRC response states:
                  "A number of respondents argued that HMRC should only be able to proceed where the GAAR Advisory Panel delivers an opinion that supports HMRC’s contention that counteraction is appropriate under the GAAR."
                  ....to which the HMRC replied:
                  "The Government agrees and will make changes to the legislation accordingly. "

                  In addition:
                  "The GAAR applies to arrangements entered into on or after July 17 2013. This means that, for income tax, arrangements to which the GAAR may apply will not
                  feature in tax returns until returns for the year ended 5th April 2014." from this HMRC document

                  In order for HMRC to issue follower notices then, in this case, the GAAR will have to put it through the panel. Boyle may make this case simpler (in some instances), but many will not fall under Boyle.

                  However, if you have entered into an arrangement which predates DOTAS it *will* will be assessed by the GAAR and it is very, very likely that HMRC will be sending you a follower notice at some point.

                  Don't be complacent, if you're in a scheme. Get out.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Michael J Perry FCA View Post
                    I predict that HMRC will use the Philip Boyle decision to issue follower notices to users of non-DOTAS schemes such as Edge.
                    ???

                    Comment


                      They'll probably argue that the TAA provisions apply, even though they were weakly/not contested by Boyle's representation.

                      This is the danger of follower notices; weakly contested case that you know nothing about as FTT lists are not public, then all of a sudden HMRC decides some aspect is similar to your own case (however small or incidental that may be), and now you have to pay up and argue later, at their leisure.

                      One option is for everyone to put in an FTT request, at least then the chances are someone you know on here will be called and you can co-ordinate accordingly

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X