Referring to this old post by varunksingh:
"ToAA is what HMRC wants to apply to all EBTs and Boyle's case has not done us any favors but some points to keep in mind
1) Many points related to ToAA were not even discussed in Boyle's case - thus HMRC in court cannot refer to Boyle's case for those arguments.
2) If courts agree that EBT loans are loans and not income as HMRC wants to argue, even after applying ToAA tax will be much low as benefit of ToAA with only getting a loan not getting full loan amount as income"
#2 is interesting. How would tax be calculated on benefit of ToAA? Is info available on what boyle had to pay? It may help us work out what we might need to pay if it comes to it. Thanks
"ToAA is what HMRC wants to apply to all EBTs and Boyle's case has not done us any favors but some points to keep in mind
1) Many points related to ToAA were not even discussed in Boyle's case - thus HMRC in court cannot refer to Boyle's case for those arguments.
2) If courts agree that EBT loans are loans and not income as HMRC wants to argue, even after applying ToAA tax will be much low as benefit of ToAA with only getting a loan not getting full loan amount as income"
#2 is interesting. How would tax be calculated on benefit of ToAA? Is info available on what boyle had to pay? It may help us work out what we might need to pay if it comes to it. Thanks

I was under the impression that once HMRC issued the assessment/COP8 they had then protected that year and could take as long as they want. If you look at the Boyle case, his assessments were for 2001/2/3
Comment