Originally posted by demby
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
LC, APN - despair ?
Collapse
X
-
You're aware of the APPG letters? and the individual letters many prominent MPs are sending Bojo and the Saj aren't you -
And that has made how much difference to HMRC?Originally posted by headspin View PostYou're aware of the APPG letters? and the individual letters many prominent MPs are sending Bojo and the Saj aren't youComment
-
Very good points.Originally posted by webberg View PostWorst case?
HMRC claim that the arrangement does not do what it says on the tin and that the original loan remains reportable (and has not been).
Further the replacement loan does not meet the alleged criteria and is also reportable (and has not been).
Further, the arrangement is a linked tax avoidance mechanism which is reportable (and has not been) and may also have been disclosable for DOTAS - by the user given the offshore connection - and has not been.
All of those carry penalties.
I confess that whilst we have the materials that Vanquish and connections made available to some clients who expressed an interest, we have not delved deep into the inner workings and technical claims because standing back and looking at the whole, we became very uneasy. In short the risk of a GAAR applying seemed to us to be sufficiently high so as to prevent us recommending use of the scheme by our clients, even with caveats.
Given that it attempts to circumvent primary anti-avoidance legislation (LC) it would seem especially vulnerable to the GAAR.
It's definitely on the upper end of the risk scale.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Today 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Yesterday 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment