Originally posted by GreenMirror
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Where's Phil gone?
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
-
I wouldn’t think there is any ‘new’ scheme that Wtt or Phil would be using! Both parties have been clear on their intensions from the start. WTT support litigation through the justice system and as far as I know Phil campaigns for LCAG to stop/ prevent it happening....Comment
-
There is, I have seen the document with his name on it - it was on twitter a while backOriginally posted by Iter View PostI wouldn’t think there is any ‘new’ scheme that Wtt or Phil would be using! Both parties have been clear on their intensions from the start. WTT support litigation through the justice system and as far as I know Phil campaigns for LCAG to stop/ prevent it happening....Comment
-
The scheme is definitely Phil Manley's through DSW. If you speak to him about it he will give you the risk warnings ( unlike most schemes ), he admits it will be challenged. The only slight difference is that this seems to be based on tax law rather than trying to get round it from what I have heard.Originally posted by Iter View PostI wouldn’t think there is any ‘new’ scheme that Wtt or Phil would be using! Both parties have been clear on their intensions from the start. WTT support litigation through the justice system and as far as I know Phil campaigns for LCAG to stop/ prevent it happening....
Scheme or legal tax planning seems to be in the eye of the beholder and it doesn't help that one side is allowed to make up rules to suit itself.
Not sure whether I am in breach of forum rules here, just trying to convey my understanding.Comment
-
I don't think it should be deleted. This information is useful for everyone. If he's peddling a scheme then so be it, people have a right to know. Unless of course you think this should be secret as well?Originally posted by GreenMirror View PostI am tempted to say that anything I say to reply to the points you have made would be moderated away - that has been made clear. Really for the sake of balance, the whole thread should be deleted? Anyway I have PMed admin and await his response.
However I don't have a view on "whatever he's up to now". I think I know a few things: -
1. There is something secretive going on - not related to "whatever he's up to now".
2. Phil has helped hundreds of people. And without him LCAG would not be where they are today.
3. Discussions like this should take place on a private forum - do you remember DTA CUK snippets being used by HMRC in court?
4. There needs to be a bit of time to consider this.
5. It would be best to let Phil give a response - though that would require mod/admin permission first.
AFAIK Graham and Phil are still recommended by CUK? Graham also suffered a great deal of vitriol. It seems to go with the turf on CUK.
Ahh I remember the good old days. Just DR and me against the rest of CUK. What fun times that was.
Comment
-
I've just read Phil's twitter feed. I can see no reference to him peddling a scheme and there's a picture of him in Cyprus where he appears to be on holiday. His remarks about other advisors are clearly aimed at THL and he was very complimentary about WTT.
I'm at a loss to understand where this smear is coming from.Comment
-
The internet is more than just Twitter, I can see things like:Originally posted by piebaps View PostI've just read Phil's twitter feed. I can see no reference to him peddling a scheme
Mr Manley has in his capacity as a leading [sic] tax advisor ...
What is the outcome of the solution?
... for some users, it may be beneficial to leave a nominal tax liability of approximately £400.
This is purely to ensure the structure is as strong as possible as we do not wish to cut corners.Comment
-
Got a link?Originally posted by Iliketax View PostThe internet is more than just Twitter, I can see things like:Comment
-
Then I think you are not reading it right. Plenty on there.Originally posted by piebaps View PostI've just read Phil's twitter feed. I can see no reference to him peddling a scheme and there's a picture of him in Cyprus where he appears to be on holiday. His remarks about other advisors are clearly aimed at THL and he was very complimentary about WTT.
I'm at a loss to understand where this smear is coming from.Comment
-
He hasn't posted on here since September either. Seems strange if you're winning good business here.Comment
Topic is closed
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andrew Griffith MP says Tories would reform IR35 Oct 7 00:41
- New umbrella company JSL rules: a 2026 guide for contractors Oct 5 22:50
- Top 5 contractor compliance challenges, as 2025-26 nears Oct 3 08:53
- Joint and Several Liability ‘won’t retire HMRC's naughty list’ Oct 2 05:28
- What contractors can take from the Industria Umbrella Ltd case Sep 30 23:05
- Is ‘Open To Work’ on LinkedIn due an IR35 dropdown menu? Sep 30 05:57
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Sep 28 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07

Comment