• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

How are you settling?

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Faith in the justice system ...

    Originally posted by zimbtar View Post
    For those of us that cannot pay - (Not that I have lived a lavish lifestyle or anything frivolous) - or are not prepared to enter into an oppressive Time to Pay agreement, what then?
    It really isn't a matter of choice at all.
    Will a Judge really make us bankrupt to service a "debt" that is

    a) over 7 years old (7 8 & 9)
    b) Not chased AT ALL over that period

    etc etc etc.
    It is all relative I know. My "debt" would be affordable to others, but is way out of my ability to even find 20% of. Things have happened in the almost 10 years that HMRC have had. Not all positive.
    Disclaimer first - I am not a lawyer - but I do have some previous experience af the bankruptcy process.

    IMO - Any petition by HMRC to make an APN non-payee bankrupt would not be looked on favourably by a judge - but not for the the reasons (a) and (b) above. The real reason that judges might be favourable to defendents is because any claimed "debt" in the bankruptcy process has to be proven by the petitioner. In the case of EBT scheme members, HMRC would have a hard job proving that there was actually a debt owed, given that they haven't won an EBT case yet, so can't use any as a precedent. Net result would be stalemate for HMRC - their least desireable outcome ...

    Any informed comment from a passing insolvency practitioner on this subject would be very welcome ...
    "If You Tolerate This Your Children Will Be Next ..."

    Comment


      #22
      No idea if it'll be the same in our cases now but ...

      Originally posted by chr16v View Post
      i am totally with you on this point Zimbtar.

      I have a settlement calculation that would take me 10-12 years to save up to pay off based on what i have left over after paying for the family essentials each month. I cant take more credit (a loan) because i am already maxed out according to my experian report and my mortgage is in joint names with my wife, where there is some equity.

      I understand the HMRC TTP offer of up to 2 years can only be assumed if you can prove you are able to pay the money back in this time.

      My question is: What happens if its clear as day that you cant afford to pay it back in 2 years?? Would i be exptected by a court to sell the family home, what type of forced action should a genuine PAYE employee expect to experience in the pursuit of this money?

      It seems like soul destroying dark times in my life are on the horizon. I wonder what the full force of not being able to pay in 2 years looks like?
      After a complete balls up of my own I owed HMRC £11k a few years back whilst in PAYE (moved from contracting to permie, on the wrong tax code, knew I wasn't paying enough tax but still p155ed it up the wall anyway, long story - as all mine seem to be ;-)). Didn't have the ready cash to pay them so they did a payment plan for me over the phone. They took all living expenses into account before deciding what they wanted from me. By living expenses I mean rent, bills, maintenance to ex, food. That bit was fairly reasonable to be honest although they wanted what I had taken 2 1/2 years to run up back in 12 months, but what they did not do was take any of my other creditors into account whatsoever (and I had plenty, I was in something of a mess at the time!). This then forced me on to a Debt Management Plan through the CCCS (now Stepchange). When I challenged HMRC about not looking at my other creditors they just said "we're not a bank you know". I took that one. It was my fault entirely and I went through a few years of pain on the DMP before finally paying HMRC everything and getting my debts back to serviceable amounts. I was named on a mortgage but did not live at the house, my ex and kids did, HMRC never asked me to extend the mortgage or sell the house or anything. Maybe that was because I'd agreed to the 12 month plan though.

      This time, however, i don't owe them the money (in my eyes at least, particularly when we're talking about paying APNs) so my stance will change with regards bending over and taking it.

      As I mention right at the start though, this was a few years ago, the APN / Settlement amounts are likely to be a lot higher than £11k, the terms will want to be longer than two years. So all in all, I realise I've not answered your question at all but I've typed all this out now so I'll post it anyway as my experience of HMRC and their "can't pay helpline"...

      Comment


        #23
        The poll is public. Do you really want your plans known to HMRC - even if only by your handle here? I can make it a private poll (hider voter identity) if you like.
        Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

        Comment


          #24
          squirrel# good to get it off your chest and still a useful insight.

          dangerouswhensober# That is really interesting, i mean that.....

          I know i cant pay the amount i have been sent in my settlement calculation, surely its not just me who cant afford these amounts of money because we no longer contract or have the means to?

          I havent had the dreaded APN yet but i appreciate its coming at some point so if i cant pay in in the 2 years (the TTP offer) and if you read the TTP conditions it does state its only offered if the tax payer can realistically prove they can pay it !

          So if a judge does not have the appetite to bankrupt someone who cant afford an APN for an amount of money that has not been proven in a court of law to be deemded owed then this is a sticking point is it not?

          I for example would loose my job if made bankrupt as my employer has this is in my T&C`s because i work for large insurer. I cant repay the amount wanted, within 2 years and i am already up to my neck in personal credit,,,, where should people like me expect go from here?

          any insolvency advice is most welcome

          Comment


            #25
            the above conversation might be worthy of its own thread instead of highjacking this poll thread, sorry guys.
            I willl copy paste it all into a new thread.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by chr16v View Post
              squirrel# good to get it off your chest and still a useful insight.

              dangerouswhensober# That is really interesting, i mean that.....

              I know i cant pay the amount i have been sent in my settlement calculation, surely its not just me who cant afford these amounts of money because we no longer contract or have the means to?

              I havent had the dreaded APN yet but i appreciate its coming at some point so if i cant pay in in the 2 years (the TTP offer) and if you read the TTP conditions it does state its only offered if the tax payer can realistically prove they can pay it !

              So if a judge does not have the appetite to bankrupt someone who cant afford an APN for an amount of money that has not been proven in a court of law to be deemded owed then this is a sticking point is it not?

              I for example would loose my job if made bankrupt as my employer has this is in my T&C`s because i work for large insurer. I cant repay the amount wanted, within 2 years and i am already up to my neck in personal credit,,,, where should people like me expect go from here?

              any insolvency advice is most welcome
              So, the advice I got regarding an APN is interesting and you may have to wait for a few sample cases to reach court. It's an enforceable debt, so you will have to pay for it. However, there is a feeling that a court may force HMRC to accept longer payment terms rather than bankruptcy because there is a chance that you may, at some point, win a case against HMRC. It would be a pyrrhic victory if you had already been bankrupted and had your life ruined. This is one of the fundamental flaws of the retrospective nature of the APNs.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                The poll is public. Do you really want your plans known to HMRC - even if only by your handle here? I can make it a private poll (hider voter identity) if you like.
                Erm yes please. Sorry I just set up a poll and wasn't sure of the settings

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by MercladUK View Post
                  Erm yes please. Sorry I just set up a poll and wasn't sure of the settings
                  Done.
                  Down with racism. Long live miscegenation!

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
                    Done.
                    Thank you...

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X