The scandal of fiddled global warming data

[pjclarke]

Chris Booker

'the US has actually been cooling since the Thirties, the hottest decade on record; whereas the latest graph, nearly half of it based on “fabricated” data, shows it to have been warming at a rate equivalent to more than 3 degrees centigrade per century.'

Eternal Zealot

Just leave the data alone. Stop trying to beat a confession out of it

[BlasterBates]

One problem is that most people think "peer reviewed research" is always right....and therefore there's no point arguing.

PLOS Medicine: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

[speling bee]

One problem is that most people think "peer reviewed research" is always right....and therefore there's no point arguing.

PLOS Medicine: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

Great straw man!

It is not that peer reviewed journal study = right

It is that:

Non-productive reviewed stuff on a blog is unconvincing.

[BrilloPad]

[BlasterBates]

Great straw man!

It is not that peer reviewed journal study = right

It is that:

Non-productive reviewed stuff on a blog is unconvincing.

...but not necessarily wrong

[EternalOptimist]

pj reckons that 97% of scientists believe in CAGW
I reckon the other 3% dont work for the government

[pjclarke]

pj reckons that 97% of scientists believe in CAGW
I reckon the other 3% dont work for the government

What does the 'C' stand for?

[speling bee]

...but not necessarily wrong

Exactly. Post the blogs and say that they have not been peer reviewed so they are not necessarily wrong.

[BlasterBates]

Exactly. Post the blogs and say that they have not been peer reviewed so they are not necessarily wrong.

Steven Goddard shows the difference between the fiddled data (peer reveiwed) and the raw data (peer reviewed).

Is your post peer reviewed or shall I ignore it.

[speling bee]

Steven Goddard shows the difference between the fiddled data (peer reveiwed) and the raw data (peer reviewed).

Is your post peer reviewed or shall I ignore it.

'Steven Goddard' asserts a difference and makes further assertions arising from his claimed difference. Get it peer reviewed and published in a learned journal and we are making progress.