I think I am going to cry

[doodab]

It doesn't. It has to do with features of modern languages that I don't like.


Sent from my iMinion using Tapatalk

They aren't a modern idea.

[suityou01]

Did I say they were? Or was I referring to them in the context of modern programming languages?


Sent from my iMinion using Tapatalk

[SpontaneousOrder]

It doesn't. It has to do with features of modern languages that I don't like.


Sent from my iMinion using Tapatalk

What cleaner way would you implement, for example, callback handlers to be invoked when buttons are clicked? Just create top-level classes for them all?

Not saying you shouldn't - I wouldn't though as you end up with all of these random classes that do random but specific things. I.e. lower cohesion than I'd like while not benefiting from any decoupling (as the callback handler code is so intimately related to the containing class that coupling isn't really an issue).

[MicrosoftBob]

If you want a decent implementation of Java, why not just use C#

[suityou01]

Why does needing a named function immediately say to you you need to create a class? For event handlers you use delegates. Read up on the observer pattern. Or if your minestrone read up on interfaces first.


Sent from my iMinion using Tapatalk

[mudskipper]

Or if your minestrone read up on interfaces first.

If my minestrone is what? I prefer pea and ham.

[suityou01]

Damn crapatalk


Sent from my iMinion using Tapatalk

[d000hg]

If you want a decent implementation of Java, why not just use C#

I agree. C# is my favourite language, although Java has so many "standard" libraries like Apache Commons.

[SpontaneousOrder]

Why does needing a named function immediately say to you you need to create a class? For event handlers you use delegates. Read up on the observer pattern. Or if your minestrone read up on interfaces first.


Sent from my iMinion using Tapatalk

That's fine if some objects just need to know, for example, that a button was clicked. But what if the clicking of the button means that something needs to happen on 3 different objects, in a specific order, with method invocation parametrisation dependant on the output of the previous method invocation? You need to write a handler somewhere to handle that specific button click?

[SpontaneousOrder]

I agree. C# is my favourite language, although Java has so many "standard" libraries like Apache Commons.

Are you still stuck on a MS stack using Csharp? (my pound button isn't working) Or are those days gone?