Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
It's also known as ''but we've always done it that way''
Ah yes, they have that here too, and they even call it 'best practise'. When things go wrong, they insist that best practise should be followed next time around, in other words, do the same thing, but do it harder.
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
Ah yes, they have that here too, and they even call it 'best practise'. When things go wrong, they insist that best practise should be followed next time around, in other words, do the same thing, but do it harder.
I got asked to help with ''improvements'', what they actually meant was making more work where there wasn't any need and making things even more complicated and obscure than the beginning.
"Ask not what you can do for your country. Ask what's for lunch." - Orson Welles
The key is to not overstate the probability of downstream risk, but play up consequences of the risk occurring..
That's the trick. But like was said earlier by 'doodab' sometimes you just need to give up on some. They can't all be saved. There's always going to be "we've being doing it this way for years" sort, nearly every failed business in the UK has the result of this attitude. Those that don't change die or have deep pockets to buy their way out of the mess or are a government project and the taxpayer picks up the tab.
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark Twain
I got asked to help with ''improvements'', what they actually meant was making more work where there wasn't any need and making things even more complicated and obscure than the beginning.
Make lots of documents with lots of lists that have to be maintained in different places, and then you can ensure there is no time left for decent testing!
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
In my early days as an 'independent', sitting in a 'design meeting' at ClientCo, the other attendees are all from (i)Logica.
Lead Logica Bot: 'We have to do what is in the client's best interest on this one'
Me: 'So when would you guys not do what was in the client's best interest?
<awkward pause>
Lead Logica Bot: 'so, moving on ...'
My subconscious is annoying. It's got a mind of its own.
In my early days as an 'independent', sitting in a 'design meeting' at ClientCo, the other attendees are all from (i)Logica.
Lead Logica Bot: 'We have to do what is in the client's best interest on this one'
Me: 'So when would you guys not do what was in the client's best interest?
<awkward pause>
Lead Logica Bot: 'so, moving on ...'
Comment