• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Western Antarctic ice sheet collapse has already begun, scientists warn

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    sea defences should be built and maintained anyway as there is a quantifiable return on investment
    But you need to decide how much to build and where, and for that you need to look to the best available predictions, just the same as anything else where you're dealing with time induced uncertainity. There isn't room to be 100% sure until after the fact and then it's too late.
    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by doodab View Post
      But you need to decide how much to build and where, and for that you need to look to the best available predictions, just the same as anything else where you're dealing with time induced uncertainity. There isn't room to be 100% sure until after the fact and then it's too late.
      Nonsense, just hire in some Poles and get them to build a 100 ft high wall all the way around the British coast. It´ll keep the immigrants out too!

      And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
        Nonsense, just hire in some Poles and get them to build a 100 ft high wall all the way around the British coast. It´ll keep the immigrants out too!

        That or we'll get a gold medal in pole vaulting in the next Olympics.
        While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

        Comment


          #24
          the dutch seem to have a pretty good record of keeping land which is below sea level erm above sea level if you know what I mean.

          Maybe we could learn something?

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by original PM View Post
            the dutch seem to have a pretty good record of keeping land which is below sea level erm above sea level if you know what I mean.

            Maybe we could learn something?
            Yes. Spend ****loads and get it right.

            BBC News - 1953 flood: How UK defences compare with the Netherlands

            The total spend on defences on the east coast in Lincolnshire, Norfolk, Suffolk and Essex was £250m in 10 years.

            In the Netherlands, 0.1% of the entire gross domestic product - between 500 and 600m euros (£420m to £513m) - is spent on a network of sluices, locks and barriers.

            The job of improving those defences - by making them bigger, using newer technology, widening rivers and building floating homes - is ongoing
            0.1% of UK GDP works out as about £1.4 billion. That's quite a bit more than we actually spend.
            While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by doodab View Post


              0.1% of UK GDP works out as about £1.4 billion. That's quite a bit more than we actually spend.
              Yes but in the grand scheme of things it is not a lot and surely cheaper than having to clean up the mess each year?

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
                Do you have proof that this will change anything?
                Yes, you'll need to recruit a whole load of northern Korean contractors just for you and your wife to afford to eat a tin of beans for a day!
                If you think my attitude stinks, you should smell my fingers.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by original PM View Post
                  the dutch seem to have a pretty good record of keeping land which is below sea level erm above sea level if you know what I mean.

                  Maybe we could learn something?
                  Yes, in fact the Dutch are so good at keeping the underwater places above water that nowadays most of the flooding happens in Limburg, which is above sea level.
                  And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Originally posted by doodab View Post
                    0.1% of UK GDP works out as about £1.4 billion. That's quite a bit more than we actually spend.
                    NL isn't really a fair comparison as by rights half the country should be underwater, whereas we only have small bits (like the Somerset Levels) below sea-level. Plus we're surrounded on all sides by coast.

                    I wonder how UK spending compares to France, Spain, Italy, The US perhaps? I bet it's not that dissimilar in how seriously we take the threat.
                    Will work inside IR35. Or for food.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
                      NL isn't really a fair comparison as by rights half the country should be underwater, whereas we only have small bits (like the Somerset Levels) below sea-level. Plus we're surrounded on all sides by coast.

                      I wonder how UK spending compares to France, Spain, Italy, The US perhaps? I bet it's not that dissimilar in how seriously we take the threat.
                      Isn't New Orleans still flooded from the last hurricane??

                      Spain and Italy are mainly in the med which is very untidal

                      France would be an interesting one - but I think the main thing is that they leave there mudflats/marshlands/floodplains as places to grow shellfish etc and not to build housing estates.

                      As side from coastal flooding though we have far too many rivers flooding or maybe we just have far to many housing estates built on flood plains!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X