Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Spain did the same, we either have a EU where people who invest in property can enjoy that or we have free for all where member states do immoral things and expect their victims to have to protect themselves with expensive laws.
Sorry this sort of behaviour makes me doubt the validity of the EU.
Spain did the same, we either have a EU where people who invest in property can enjoy that or we have free for all where member states do immoral things and expect their victims to have to protect themselves with expensive laws.
Sorry this sort of behaviour makes me doubt the validity of the EU.
But on the one hand Eurosceptics complain that countries are being forced to comply with EU law, and on the other hand you want property rights enforced across the whole EU and you don't think that's happening. Which is it to be?
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014
But on the one hand Eurosceptics complain that countries are being forced to comply with EU law, and on the other hand you want property rights enforced across the whole EU and you don't think that's happening. Which is it to be?
Property rights are fairly fundamental, if the EU can't manage that then its not much use.
Property rights are fairly fundamental, if the EU can't manage that then its not much use.
As I've shown, the EU has laws to protect property rights. It is, unfortunately, a long and expensive process to use those laws, but they could start by by contacting somebody who is qualified in Portuguese property laws, and thereby should at least understand Article 17 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and how to use it in a court case. Let me google that for you. They might not even have to go so far as the European courts, if they can convince a court in Portugal of their rights.
What's being done to those people appears to be very unjust indeed and utterly wrong, but perhaps the EU law is actually their only protection against what the Portuguese government is doing. Or perhaps the European Convention on Human Rights (which is not an EU thingummy).
They could take the EU Charter route, or outside the EU, the European Convention on Human Rights, European Convention on Human Rights - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia depending on what the fully qualified lawyer says gives them the best chance, instead of simply believing a ´trainee barrister´.
I don't know what the Portuguese constitution has to say about this, so I don't know if that's an option for them.
Spain did the same, we either have a EU where people who invest in property can enjoy that or we have free for all where member states do immoral things and expect their victims to have to protect themselves with expensive laws.
Sorry this sort of behaviour makes me doubt the validity of the EU.
I was under the impression that much of the property that has been repossessed in Spain was either due to people not being able to pay their mortgages (they thought they could rent out as holiday homes but didn't work out) or unscrupulous developers sold the property or land event though there was no permit to actually build there which is actually a bit different...
“Brexit is having a wee in the middle of the room at a house party because nobody is talking to you, and then complaining about the smell.”
Comment