Originally posted by BrilloPad
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
If the Scots really want independence....
Collapse
X
-
Unlike the UK, which only has two parties?The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park -
Do you really believe that?Originally posted by tomtomagain View PostIf the elected set of MPs' decided that they had had enough of democracy then they would be thrown into jail by the rest of society.Comment
-
But there are. The courts. The police. The press. The army. The Queen. And most importantly - The Public.Originally posted by speling bee View PostMy point is that there are no constitutional safeguards.
You think that writing down a "constitution" on a bit of paper would be any more secure? Of course not.Comment
-
Do you really believe if the 600 MP's decided to vote to abolish democracy that nothing would happen?Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostDo you really believe that?Comment
-
Explain how each of these has a constitutional function in over-riding the supremacy of Parliament.Originally posted by tomtomagain View PostBut there are. The courts. The police. The press. The army. The Queen. And most importantly - The Public.
You think that writing down a "constitution" on a bit of paper would be any more secure? Of course not.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
No. This is getting tedious.Originally posted by speling bee View PostExplain how each of these has a constitutional function in over-riding the supremacy of Parliament.Comment
-
Originally posted by tomtomagain View PostDo you really believe if the 600 MP's decided to vote to abolish democracy that nothing would happen?
Hitler was democratically voted in, so anything is possibleDoing the needful since 1827Comment
-
Particularly with governments giving powers away to the EU.Originally posted by amcdonald View PostHitler was democratically voted in, so anything is possibleLet us not forget EU open doors immigration benefits IT contractors more than anyoneComment
-
Because Parliament is supreme and if it wishes to act to disable democratic instruments, then it cannot be challenged constitutionally. Any challenge would be unconstitutional: e.g. military coup, popular revolution, general strike, appointment by the Privy Council of an interim administration. Any of these might be justified, but they would not be constitutionally justified.Originally posted by tomtomagain View PostNo. This is getting tedious.
Now, stop being so wrong.The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.
George Frederic Watts
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_ParkComment
-
Originally posted by BrilloPad View PostThe Scots will head faster towards abject poverty once they don't have the English bailing out the obese gits.
We need out free pies !!!
Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Blocking the 2025 Loan Charge settlement opportunity from being a genuine opportunity is… HMRC Yesterday 07:41
- How a buyer’s market in UK property for 2026 is contractors’ double-edge sword Feb 11 07:12
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Feb 10 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Feb 9 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44

Comment