• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Another UKIP charmer

Collapse
X
  •  
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by speling bee View Post
    **** off.
    And it was so.

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
      And it was so.
      At last a use for that little triangle button.
      The material prosperity of a nation is not an abiding possession; the deeds of its people are.

      George Frederic Watts

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postman's_Park

      Comment


        #13
        ... but we are with him on
        He also wants free euthanasia for the over-80s
        right?
        How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

        Comment


          #14
          Originally posted by Troll View Post
          ... but we are with him on right?
          Why over 80s? If I'm 79 and sick why can't I choose to end it? Or 49? Or 29?

          I think voluntary euthanasia should be legal if properly controlled - I don't think simply 'being old' is a good reason for it though.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Flashman View Post
            And lets hope the people of Kent don't vote for him.

            Its a great thing democracy.



            And on the subject of democracy what would you do if, say, the EU decided to make abortion illegal?

            How would you oppose that hypothetical EU law?
            If the EU voted to make abortion legal,then UKIP would vote to make it illegal because they automatically vote against everything.

            Comment


              #16
              Compulsory euthanasia for UKIP candidates who spout offensive nonsense.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Brussels Slumdog View Post
                If the EU voted to make abortion legal,then UKIP wouldn't vote to make it illegal because they never turn up
                FTFY
                While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by mudskipper View Post
                  Why over 80s? If I'm 79 and sick why can't I choose to end it? Or 49? Or 29?

                  I think voluntary euthanasia should be legal if properly controlled - I don't think simply 'being old' is a good reason for it though.
                  Think it's just an arbitrary number - you've had your three score and ten, plus a bit more... the costs versus economic benefit to the country is very much against - you've had you time so shuffle off this mortal coil and let the next generation take over
                  Presumably at 29 & 49 you still have a contribution to make
                  How fortunate for governments that the people they administer don't think

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by Troll View Post
                    Think it's just an arbitrary number - you've had your three score and ten, plus a bit more... the costs versus economic benefit to the country is very much against - you've had you time so shuffle off this mortal coil and let the next generation take over
                    Presumably at 29 & 49 you still have a contribution to make
                    But that is the same "tell the good little worker bees what to do" mentality that the big three parties already have. Where is personal freedom of choice in that? How is it an alternative?

                    Making it free for all people with a quality of life they find unbearable isn't entirely a bad idea, except that of course that covers absolutely everyone who would actually want to do it. Those who find life bearable tend to soldier on.
                    Last edited by doodab; 4 May 2014, 18:22.
                    While you're waiting, read the free novel we sent you. It's a Spanish story about a guy named 'Manual.'

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Troll View Post
                      Think it's just an arbitrary number - you've had your three score and ten, plus a bit more... the costs versus economic benefit to the country is very much against - you've had you time so shuffle off this mortal coil and let the next generation take over
                      Presumably at 29 & 49 you still have a contribution to make
                      My point is that putting an 'arbitrary number' on it is then saying 'over 80' = past their best before date.

                      Allowing those who are terminally ill or in severe chronic pain to take their lives (at any age) is arguably humane. Restricting it to over-80s it becomes an entirely different motive. Human life should never be about cost vs economic benefit - this is the same argument he put forward for aborting handicapped foetuses.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X