Well I believe you know what my thoughts on the government are, however the government is so far removed from anything resembling restraint that even a reduction to 25% would be a huge leap forward. I'm not too fond of those sort of metrics, however, because ideally what should constrain the government is the scope of the services it provides, if nothing else. At the moment, it is at the behest of lobby groups and various ideologues who think the tax system is there to loot and plunder the 'wealthy' (mostly just the middle class.) The wealthy, though they bear much of the tax burden, are also the ablest to move their wealth about, until of course the OECD, the parasitical IMF and the equally parasitical governments supporting it get their way. The threat of secession for areas that want to go at it alone, such as Scotland, could also be a useful constraint. I'm not too optimistic about constitutions given the history of countries like the US, but I agree with what you say.
Constraints on its ability to borrow and inflate would be welcome. It just pisses me off that they assume that they have carte blanche to spend as they will, and then just pass the bill onto us afterwards and act as though it is through lack of patriotism or some other ideal they conveniently pull out of their posteriors that we don't pay 'enough' tax. These are people whose entire vocation as politicians or bureaucrats is tax-funded. The shroud of 'democratically elected government' also has its role in it, because if some bare minority of the population voted them in on promises they never intended to deliver, obviously we all asked for it.
Constraints on its ability to borrow and inflate would be welcome. It just pisses me off that they assume that they have carte blanche to spend as they will, and then just pass the bill onto us afterwards and act as though it is through lack of patriotism or some other ideal they conveniently pull out of their posteriors that we don't pay 'enough' tax. These are people whose entire vocation as politicians or bureaucrats is tax-funded. The shroud of 'democratically elected government' also has its role in it, because if some bare minority of the population voted them in on promises they never intended to deliver, obviously we all asked for it.
Comment