- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Will the loony left rape your daughters?
Collapse
X
-
Will the loony left rape your daughters?
<Insert idea here> will never be adopted because the politicians are in the pockets of the banks! -
Don't forget Margaret Hodge and her input into childrens homes.Socialism is inseparably interwoven with totalitarianism and the abject worship of the state.
No Socialist Government conducting the entire life and industry of the country could afford to allow free, sharp, or violently-worded expressions of public discontent. -
Comment
-
No but I think the issue is that they were seen to be defending the rights of groups with non conformist sexual orientations, including paedophiles.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostNo they won't.
I was looking at some facsimiles of the original legal documents yesterday and there was a clause justifying the proposed lowering of the age of consent to 10 as it could be shown that sex between a child and an adult could sometimes be gratifying for the child.
Guess whose signature was at the bottom of that?Comment
-
I said 'no they won't' because I don't have any daughters and then I get an analysis of non-conformist sexual orientations. Typical CUK tut tut ...Originally posted by Gittins Gal View PostNo but I think the issue is that they were seen to be defending the rights of groups with non conformist sexual orientations, including paedophiles.
I was looking at some facsimiles of the original legal documents yesterday and there was a clause justifying the proposed lowering of the age of consent to 10 as it could be shown that sex between a child and an adult could sometimes be gratifying for the child.
Guess whose signature was at the bottom of that?
And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Just playing devil's advocate, but exactly what is this person accused of? A link to an organisation?
Hell I bet I could click a few http links or post a inappropriate comment on twitter and be thrown in please custody."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
-
There are better ways to ask for more custard; spell it right to start with.Originally posted by scooterscot View PostHell I bet I could click a few http links or post a inappropriate comment on twitter and be thrown in please custody.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Lobbying for lowering of the age of consent partly on behalf of the Paedophile Information Exchange who were affiliated to the NCCL.Originally posted by scooterscot View PostJust playing devil's advocate, but exactly what is this person accused of? A link to an organisation?
Hell I bet I could click a few http links or post a inappropriate comment on twitter and be thrown in please custody.Comment
-
I'm a bit concerned about the accusations. A group lobbying for lowering the age of consent is basically spreading an opinion, and surely they should be free to do that, regardless of how objectionable we might find that opinion. In the current climate, where paedophilia seems to be regarded as one of the worst crimes anyone can commit, I think it's quite scary that people can be accused of being or supporting paedophiles on the basis of expressing an opinion. This is starting to look like a witch hunt.And what exactly is wrong with an "ad hominem" argument? Dodgy Agent, 16-5-2014Comment
-
Yes exactly. And I'm no fan of politicians of either colour.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View PostI'm a bit concerned about the accusations. A group lobbying for lowering the age of consent is basically spreading an opinion, and surely they should be free to do that, regardless of how objectionable we might find that opinion. In the current climate, where paedophilia seems to be regarded as one of the worst crimes anyone can commit, I think it's quite scary that people can be accused of being or supporting paedophiles on the basis of expressing an opinion. This is starting to look like a witch hunt."Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience". Mark TwainComment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- How salary sacrifice pension changes will hit contractors Dec 24 07:48
- All the big IR35/employment status cases of 2025: ranked Dec 23 08:55
- Why IT contractors are (understandably) fed up with recruitment agencies Dec 22 13:57
- Contractors, don’t fall foul of HMRC’s expenses rules this Christmas party season Dec 19 09:55
- A delay to the employment status consultation isn’t why an IR35 fix looks further out of reach Dec 18 08:22
- How asking a tech jobs agency basic questions got one IT contractor withdrawn Dec 17 07:21
- Are Home Office immigration policies sacrificing IT contractors for ‘cheap labour’? Dec 16 07:48
- Will 2026 see the return of the ‘Outside IR35’ contractor? Dec 15 07:51
- Contractors, Reeves’ dividends raid is disastrous. Act, but without acceptance Dec 12 07:10
- Why JSL indemnity clauses putting umbrella contractors on the hook could be a PR disaster Dec 11 07:36

Comment