Originally posted by VectraMan
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Turnover tax
Collapse
X
-
Most incorporate in Delaware anyway, which is an on-shore tax haven. But there's no chance of this government cracking down on DE as a tax shelter.Originally posted by MaryPoppinsI hadn't really understood this 'pwned' expression until I read DirtyDog's post. -
Actually Amazon don't charge 20% on ebooks (or any digital content), they charge 3% because place of supply rules mean they have to charge Lux. VAT rates on ebooks (hence the rule change from next Jan, when they will have to charge 20%).Originally posted by DirtyDog View PostMy mistake - only for eBooks do they charge UK consumers 20% and pay over 3% to Luxembourg.
https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/help/cus...?nodeId=502578Last edited by TheCyclingProgrammer; 7 February 2014, 15:46.Comment
-
Plus there isn't this utter air of disdain and condescension you get when dealing with the likes of HMRC, or a local council. Incompetent and arrogant.Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Postc) they manage money rather better than politicians have done for the last 100 odd years
I would much rather see Amazon keep the money than give it to a bunch of profligate, snotty know-nothings.
I think the government should come up with a list of services it deems to be "essential" (whether or not they are, or whether or not only it can provide them is another story), come up with a figure for providing them and limit its annual tax revenues to that. No power to borrow, no power to inflate, no power to raise further taxes. I doubt this would last long, but it's not the populace's problem that they can't bloody manage 'their' money and are so addicted to power that they cannot say no to anyone offering them sufficient graft.
I would say get them out of the provision of healthcare and education entirely, and deal with welfare via a negative income tax/guaranteed income, since the ostensible purpose behind supplying these services via the govt is their universal provision, anyway.
Even if fracking does take off in Britain, I still believe our politicians would manage to pocket the revenues but still end up with a huge debt by the end of it.
c).Originally posted by VectraMan View Post
Just pointing out how unworkable these "solutions" are. We need to either a) leave the EU and abandon free trade (call that the UKIP option), b) the EU needs to decide one CT rate for everyone, or c) accept that this sort of crap is always going to happen and we're powerless to prevent it.
As for a), abandoning free trade has nothing to do with UKIP. They are not protectionists.Last edited by Zero Liability; 7 February 2014, 21:11.Comment
-
It's not a tax heaven, the reason companies in USA register there is because its cheap to maintain company and corporate law is very well established in that state so things are a lot more predictable and cheaper to deal with law wise.Originally posted by DirtyDog View PostMost incorporate in Delaware anyway, which is an on-shore tax haven. But there's no chance of this government cracking down on DE as a tax shelter.Comment
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Comment